From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S272693AbRILIIG>; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 04:08:06 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S272695AbRILIH4>; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 04:07:56 -0400
Received: from t2.redhat.com ([199.183.24.243]:55288 "EHLO
	passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S272693AbRILIHs>; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 04:07:48 -0400
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3 01/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
X-Accept-Language: en_GB
In-Reply-To: <E15gwc5-0003VR-00@the-village.bc.nu> 
In-Reply-To: <E15gwc5-0003VR-00@the-village.bc.nu> 
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.20pre10 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 09:08:05 +0100
Message-ID: <23591.1000282085@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk said:
> o	Fix null request_mode return 			(David Woodhouse) 

Is this attribution correct?

Grepping for request_mode in my outbox, the 2.2.20-pre10 patch, and the 
dark recesses of what passes for my brain turns up no matches.

--
dwmw2