From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933657AbcBZQmc (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:42:32 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49169 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932737AbcBZQmb (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:42:31 -0500 From: Thomas Renninger To: Ingo Molnar Cc: lenb@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not modify MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS in kernel Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:42:29 +0100 Message-ID: <2368347.dTYjf0g22d@skinner> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.9 (Linux/3.16.7-29-desktop; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4687430.mfM0GbdeDL@skinner> References: <4687430.mfM0GbdeDL@skinner> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This in fact is a re-send, including x86 maintainers. Even this is a PM (Power Management) issue, the code is in the x86 architecture paths. >>From last submit: > > Patch is against latest linux-pm kernel. > > Rafael: Can you queue this one up, please. > Well, I'm not an x86 arch maintainer. > Can you at least CC them, please? Can someone, best would be a x86 maintainer?, take the patch please if it is considered ok. Thanks, Thomas