From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757762AbYDMMsg (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Apr 2008 08:48:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751921AbYDMMs1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Apr 2008 08:48:27 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate09.web.de ([217.72.192.184]:54247 "EHLO fmmailgate09.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751281AbYDMMs0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Apr 2008 08:48:26 -0400 Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:45:18 +0200 Message-Id: <237143435@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: devzero@web.de To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: cebbert@redhat.com, hidave.darkstar@gmail.com, jeremy@goop.org Subject: netsc520 - skeleton in the closet ? Organization: http://freemail.web.de/ X-Provags-Id: V01U2FsdGVkX18SlDvGxdkx3roUjvrVCo9qdv60ZultC09BX8wcqnXM9KwKI OlcnQHOxqqfsZv6RKOJlgwrlmqaUdD9GenomwBd3jXGxyGHmkQ= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org i'm doing some module testing from time to time and i'm somewhat sure, that there is an issue with netsc520 module, as i have seen more than one occasion that after load/unloading of that module (w/o presence of the appropriate hw), other modules had issues. see http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120664963508105&w=2 for example. now,by chance i came across this one: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=118274309325836&w=2 >> > >> netsc520 is doing iounmap() of an area it did >> > >> ioremap_nocache() on earlier, because it has now failed to >> > >> find a device. Why it went BUG() I have no idea. >> > >> >> > > >> > > Hi, maybe some config option cause this issue, here is my current >> > > working-ok config file: >> > >> > What are the differences from the non-working config? >> > >> > J >> > >> The diffrences is net520c item. >> >sorry it is netsc520, I will post the patch after a while. so, it sounds there is a known issue with netsc520, but i'm not sure if it's the related and if that mentioned patch has been posted, at least i don't find it in git due to x86/64 unification. maybe someone has a clue.... ? _____________________________________________________________________ Der WEB.DE SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! http://smartsurfer.web.de/?mc=100071&distributionid=000000000066