public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: ericvh@kernel.org, lucho@ionkov.net, asmadeus@codewreck.org,
	Pierre Barre <pierre@barre.sh>
Cc: v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, sandeen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix access mode flags being ORed instead of replaced
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2026 16:51:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2406037.ElGaqSPkdT@weasel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ddc72da-d196-4f01-8755-0086f670e779@app.fastmail.com>

On Thursday, 2 April 2026 12:03:12 CEST Pierre Barre wrote:
> Since commit 1f3e4142c0eb ("9p: convert to the new mount API"),
> v9fs_apply_options() applies parsed mount flags with |= onto flags
> already set by v9fs_session_init(). For 9P2000.L, session_init sets
> V9FS_ACCESS_CLIENT as the default, so when the user mounts with
> "access=user", both bits end up set. Access mode checks compare
> against exact values, so having both bits set matches neither mode.
> 
> This causes v9fs_fid_lookup() to fall through to the default switch
> case, using INVALID_UID (nobody/65534) instead of current_fsuid()
> for all fid lookups. Root is then unable to chown or perform other
> privileged operations.
> 
> Fix by clearing the access mask before applying the user's choice.
> 
> Fixes: 1f3e4142c0eb ("9p: convert to the new mount API")
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Barre <pierre@barre.sh>
> ---
>  fs/9p/v9fs.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/9p/v9fs.c b/fs/9p/v9fs.c
> index 057487efaaeb..05a5e1c4df35 100644
> --- a/fs/9p/v9fs.c
> +++ b/fs/9p/v9fs.c
> @@ -413,7 +413,11 @@ static void v9fs_apply_options(struct v9fs_session_info
> *v9ses, /*
>          * Note that we must |= flags here as session_init already
>          * set basic flags. This adds in flags from parsed options.
> +        * Access flags are mutually exclusive, so clear any access
> +        * bits set by session_init before applying the user's choice.

That phrase is a bit suboptimal, because V9FS_ACCESS_ANY is actually a bit
combination of single, user and client. But OK, I currently don't have a
better phrase for it since the access fields have to be replaced altogether.

As for the actual behaviour change; makes sense to me:

Reviewed-by: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>

>          */
> +       if (ctx->session_opts.flags & V9FS_ACCESS_MASK)
> +               v9ses->flags &= ~V9FS_ACCESS_MASK;
>         v9ses->flags |= ctx->session_opts.flags;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_9P_FSCACHE
>         v9ses->cachetag = ctx->session_opts.cachetag;
> --
> 2.51.0





      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-09 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-02 10:03 [PATCH] 9p: fix access mode flags being ORed instead of replaced Pierre Barre
2026-04-02 10:10 ` Pierre Barre
2026-04-09  8:12 ` Pierre Barre
2026-04-09 14:51 ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2406037.ElGaqSPkdT@weasel \
    --to=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
    --cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
    --cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
    --cc=pierre@barre.sh \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox