* (no subject)
@ 2009-12-27 21:06 Craig Dunwoody
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Craig Dunwoody @ 2009-12-27 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: cdunwoody
sage weil writes (2009/12/21):
>If you want stability, then it's probably too early to merge. If you
>want active users, that essentially hinges on stability too. But if
>it's interest in/demand for an alternative distributed fs, then the
>sooner it's merged the better.
I understand there are many considerations about when to merge something
new, but in general would like to see the Ceph client merged sometime
soon.
In my view, there is a wide range of applications for which Ceph has
the potential to be significantly more efficient than the other
distributed file systems that I know about.
Ceph has a solid architecture and a small but strong dev team. I
believe that the project is now at a point where wider-scale testing
can greatly accelerate progress toward production-level usability.
Having the client in mainline will help reduce barriers to such
testing.
Craig Dunwoody
GraphStream Incorporated
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-12-27 21:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-27 21:06 Craig Dunwoody
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox