public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: chengzhihao1 <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	mcoquelin stm32 <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	kirill shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/15] ubi: fastmap: Add all fastmap pebs into 'ai->fastmap' when fm->used_blocks>=2
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 08:27:46 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <244238061.248369.1641886066066.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f7df7ba-9557-58a3-7978-e5d14a72f234@huawei.com>

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "chengzhihao1" <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
> An: "richard" <richard@nod.at>
> CC: "Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>, "Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>, "mcoquelin stm32"
> <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, "kirill shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>, "Sascha Hauer"
> <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>, "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Januar 2022 03:48:24
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH v6 12/15] ubi: fastmap: Add all fastmap pebs into 'ai->fastmap' when fm->used_blocks>=2

> Hi Richard,
>> scan_ai->fastmap may contain also old fastmap PEBs.
>> In the area < UBI_FM_MAX_START you can find outdated fastmap PEBs.
>> e.g. after power-cut.
>> That's why scan_ai->fastmap is copied into ai->fastmap.
>> Later in ubi_wl_init() these outdated PEBs will get erased.
>> So, you cannot remove this code.
> I thought old fastmap PEBs(async erase works in ubi_update_fastmap())
> will be counted into erase PEBs in the next attaching process, because I
> saw following code snippet in ubi_write_fastmap():
> 1260         list_for_each_entry(ubi_wrk, &ubi->works, list) {
> 
> 1261                 if (ubi_is_erase_work(ubi_wrk)) {
> 
> 1262                         wl_e = ubi_wrk->e;
> 
> 1263                         ubi_assert(wl_e);
> 
> 1264
> 
> 1265                         fec = (struct ubi_fm_ec *)(fm_raw +
> fm_pos);
> 1266
> 
> 1267                         fec->pnum = cpu_to_be32(wl_e->pnum);
> 
> 1268                         set_seen(ubi, wl_e->pnum, seen_pebs);
> 
> 1269                         fec->ec = cpu_to_be32(wl_e->ec);
> 
> 1270
> 
> 1271                         erase_peb_count++;
> 
> 1272                         fm_pos += sizeof(*fec);
> 
> 1273                         ubi_assert(fm_pos <= ubi->fm_size);
> 
> 1274                 }
> 
> 1275         }
> 
> 1276         fmh->erase_peb_count = cpu_to_be32(erase_peb_count);
> Half-writing on fastmap will be recognized in scanning, and UBI
> fallbacks full scanning, So, I come up with two situations:
> 1. power-cut before new fastmap written, the old fastmap is completely
> saved until next attaching, and some free PEBs are written with new
> fastmap data. Luckly, fastmap anchor PEB's vid header is written first
> of all, bad fastmap will be returned by ubi_attach_fastmap() in next
> attaching.
> 2. power-cut after new fastmap written, the old fastmap PEBs will be
> added into 'ai->erase' list in next attaching.
> Did I miss other possible circumstances?

In ubi_wl_init() there is another corner case documented:
                        /*
                         * The fastmap update code might not find a free PEB for
                         * writing the fastmap anchor to and then reuses the
                         * current fastmap anchor PEB. When this PEB gets erased
                         * and a power cut happens before it is written again we
                         * must make sure that the fastmap attach code doesn't
                         * find any outdated fastmap anchors, hence we erase the
                         * outdated fastmap anchor PEBs synchronously here.
                         */
                        if (aeb->vol_id == UBI_FM_SB_VOLUME_ID)
                                sync = true;

So ubi_wl_init() makes sure that all old fastmap anchors get erased before UBI
starts to operate. With your change this is no longer satisfied.

Thanks,
//richard

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-11  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-27  3:22 [PATCH v6 00/15] Some bugfixs for ubi/ubifs Zhihao Cheng
2021-12-27  3:22 ` [PATCH v6 01/15] ubifs: rename_whiteout: Fix double free for whiteout_ui->data Zhihao Cheng
2021-12-27  3:22 ` [PATCH v6 02/15] ubifs: Fix deadlock in concurrent rename whiteout and inode writeback Zhihao Cheng
2021-12-27  3:22 ` [PATCH v6 03/15] ubifs: Fix wrong number of inodes locked by ui_mutex in ubifs_inode comment Zhihao Cheng
2021-12-27  3:22 ` [PATCH v6 04/15] ubifs: Add missing iput if do_tmpfile() failed in rename whiteout Zhihao Cheng
2021-12-27  3:22 ` [PATCH v6 05/15] ubifs: Rename whiteout atomically Zhihao Cheng
2022-01-09 21:14   ` Richard Weinberger
2022-01-10  9:35     ` Zhihao Cheng
2022-01-10 10:14       ` Richard Weinberger
2022-01-10 20:58         ` Richard Weinberger
2021-12-27  3:22 ` [PATCH v6 06/15] ubifs: Fix 'ui->dirty' race between do_tmpfile() and writeback work Zhihao Cheng
2021-12-27  3:22 ` [PATCH v6 07/15] ubifs: Rectify space amount budget for mkdir/tmpfile operations Zhihao Cheng
2021-12-27  3:22 ` [PATCH v6 08/15] ubifs: setflags: Make dirtied_ino_d 8 bytes aligned Zhihao Cheng
2021-12-27  3:22 ` [PATCH v6 09/15] ubifs: Fix read out-of-bounds in ubifs_wbuf_write_nolock() Zhihao Cheng
2021-12-27  3:22 ` [PATCH v6 10/15] ubifs: Fix to add refcount once page is set private Zhihao Cheng
2021-12-27  3:22 ` [PATCH v6 11/15] ubi: fastmap: Return error code if memory allocation fails in add_aeb() Zhihao Cheng
2021-12-27  3:22 ` [PATCH v6 12/15] ubi: fastmap: Add all fastmap pebs into 'ai->fastmap' when fm->used_blocks>=2 Zhihao Cheng
2022-01-10 23:23   ` Richard Weinberger
2022-01-11  2:48     ` Zhihao Cheng
2022-01-11  7:27       ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2022-01-11 11:44         ` Zhihao Cheng
2022-01-11 11:57           ` Richard Weinberger
2022-01-11 13:23             ` Zhihao Cheng
2022-01-11 13:56               ` Richard Weinberger
2022-01-12  3:46                 ` Zhihao Cheng
2022-01-14 18:45                   ` Richard Weinberger
2022-01-15  8:22                     ` Zhihao Cheng
2022-01-15  8:46                       ` Zhihao Cheng
2022-01-15 10:01                         ` Richard Weinberger
2022-01-17  1:31                           ` Zhihao Cheng
2022-01-17  2:52                             ` Zhihao Cheng
2021-12-27  3:22 ` [PATCH v6 13/15] ubifs: ubifs_writepage: Mark page dirty after writing inode failed Zhihao Cheng
2021-12-27  3:22 ` [PATCH v6 14/15] ubifs: ubifs_releasepage: Remove ubifs_assert(0) to valid this process Zhihao Cheng
2021-12-27  3:22 ` [PATCH v6 15/15] ubi: fastmap: Fix high cpu usage of ubi_bgt by making sure wl_pool not empty Zhihao Cheng
2022-01-17  1:40   ` Zhihao Cheng
2021-12-27 10:13 ` [PATCH v6 00/15] Some bugfixs for ubi/ubifs Richard Weinberger
2021-12-27 12:19   ` Zhihao Cheng
2021-12-27 13:00     ` Richard Weinberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=244238061.248369.1641886066066.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at \
    --to=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox