From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761219AbZAQEpK (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:45:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755361AbZAQEoz (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:44:55 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:48133 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751747AbZAQEox (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:44:53 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20090116134930.68e783aa.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20090116134930.68e783aa.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090115200315.EBE3.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090115093514.f3f6b8ff.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090116124949.7828a559.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090115175917.8e0ae536.akpm@linux-foundation.org> To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Andrew Morton , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Prarit Bhargava , KOSAKI Motohiro , LKML , linux-ia64 , Sam Ravnborg , Kyle McMartin , Tony Luck , Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 04:43:52 +0000 Message-ID: <24484.1232167432@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > I have dropped the nfs tree from linux-next for today. > > > > Just for this buglet? That sounds a bit savage. > > There was another problem with the fscache code as well. Also, this was > reported the day before yesterday and got no response. I've been flying to Tasmania for LCA and spending much time sitting around in too many different airports. > Also, the other patch that added EXPORT_SYMBOL(copy_page) "recently" was > from December, *2007* ... Also, this is 2.6.30 material and they have a long > time to fix it. The patch was required Tuesday morning for my patches to build on top of Linus's vanilla kernel. This may have changed, but I haven't checked - too busy enjoying my pre-LCA hols in Tas:-) David