From: "Svetoslav Slavtchev" <svetljo@gmx.de>
To: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
Cc: opengeometry@yahoo.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Multiple keyboard/monitor vs linux-2.6?
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 11:28:47 +0100 (MET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2497.1071311327@www59.gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200312131020.hBDAKFji000447@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk
> Quote from William Park <opengeometry@yahoo.ca>:
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 12:09:05AM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> > > if you just want muliple X users bruby/ ruby should work as stable as
> > > 2.4 /2.6 (works at least for 20-25 people i helped, reading the howto
> > > and getting it up),
> > >
> > > but if you want multiple virtual terminals, you'll have to experiment
> :-)
> > > and read a lot the linuxconsole ml, as it's not yet documented
> >
> > Multiple X users (via xdm login) is what I'm looking for. X-terminal is
> > the canonical answer. In the light of recent development in PXE support
> > which effectively eliminated third-party packages like Etherboot,
> > Netboot, Rom-a-matic, and LTSP, I was wondering if it's possible to go
> > the next logical step and eliminate motherboard/case as well.
> >
> > This would be ideal for home market, where you want multiple users (ie.
> > kids) but with only one PC. Sell it as "Linux Mainframe"... :-)
>
> Search the archives - this comes up every few months on LKML.
>
> John.
>
with the small difference that now it's doable,
and previously mostly impossible
/* ya i know that Miguel solution exist quite a long time
* already, but it's a bit hard to use it on systems with more
* then 2 users and configuring the input devices is not easy,
* optimal, and tere is no way to get multi-user virtual consoles
*
* ruby doesn't have this issues
*/
best,
svetljo
--
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-13 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-12 22:27 Multiple keyboard/monitor vs linux-2.6? Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-12-12 22:45 ` William Park
2003-12-12 23:09 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-12-12 23:46 ` William Park
2003-12-13 1:05 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-12-13 10:20 ` John Bradford
2003-12-13 10:28 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev [this message]
[not found] <fa.da53dsa.dho216@ifi.uio.no>
2003-12-12 21:43 ` William Park
2003-12-13 13:14 ` Helge Hafting
2003-12-13 21:12 ` William Park
2003-12-15 12:18 ` Helge Hafting
2003-12-15 20:38 ` William Park
2003-12-15 17:18 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-12 10:03 Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-12-12 9:12 Boszormenyi Zoltan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2497.1071311327@www59.gmx.net \
--to=svetljo@gmx.de \
--cc=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opengeometry@yahoo.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox