From: "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>, "Shen, Yijun" <Yijun.Shen@dell.com>,
Lyndon Sanche <lsanche@lyndeno.ca>
Cc: "pali@kernel.org" <pali@kernel.org>,
"srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com"
<srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
"ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"lkp@intel.com" <lkp@intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
"platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dell Client Kernel <Dell.Client.Kernel@dell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] platform/x86: dell-laptop: Implement platform_profile
Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 17:14:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24fa8cdd-4c7b-4ec2-bffd-ff80e190f5fa@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e583ccb0-b0be-4fb6-8e70-e4cd6921d77d@gmx.de>
On 5/12/2024 1:47 PM, Armin Wolf wrote:
>> Why? Windows also does ACPI-WMI differently than Linux. It's not as
>> easy to check both from a Windows utility due to that.
>
> Actually, it is quite easy to check both interfaces from a Windows
> utility. Both ACPI-WMI objects can be accessed by
> Windows applications, the utility just has to interact with an
> additional WMI object, but they decided to not do it.
>
Ah I didn't realize that they're actually instanciable from the WMI
repository in an application, but that makes perfect sense with how easy
it is to do from PowerShell.
> Also the original smbios-thermal-ctl utility was created by Dell itself
> (i think?), so they likely would have implemented this
> if it really was necessary.
>
It was created at a time that the ACPI WMI BIOS attributes interface
didn't exist. I've understood that the general direction is to use the
WMI BIOS attributes interface in the future.
That's why I was suggesting using both, if such a transition happens
then this driver would be ready for it.
> As Dell likely only tests their machines with Windows (if at all), i
> propose that we try to match the Windows behavior.
I don't have a strong horse in this game, but I see what you mean in
terms of general compatibility.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-12 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-25 17:27 [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-laptop: Implement platform_profile Lyndon Sanche
2024-04-25 20:07 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-04-25 20:24 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-04-25 20:28 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-04-25 21:51 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2024-04-26 0:38 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-04-26 16:14 ` srinivas pandruvada
2024-04-26 18:23 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-04-26 18:24 ` srinivas pandruvada
2024-04-25 20:12 ` Pali Rohár
2024-04-25 20:27 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-04-25 20:31 ` Pali Rohár
2024-04-25 21:07 ` Armin Wolf
2024-04-26 0:54 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-04-26 2:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Lyndon Sanche
2024-04-26 9:23 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-04-26 18:05 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-13 20:09 ` kernel test robot
2024-04-26 6:57 ` [PATCH] " Ilpo Järvinen
2024-04-29 16:48 ` [PATCH v3] " Lyndon Sanche
2024-04-29 17:45 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-04-29 17:51 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-04-29 21:25 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-04-29 21:21 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-04-30 10:31 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-04-30 18:38 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-04-30 15:36 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-01 8:16 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-01 16:35 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-01 17:07 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-01 1:14 ` [PATCH v4] " Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-01 1:36 ` Pali Rohár
2024-05-01 1:42 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-01 21:58 ` [PATCH v5] " Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-03 10:19 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-04 1:03 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-06 10:18 ` Hans de Goede
2024-05-07 16:00 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-03 21:19 ` Armin Wolf
2024-05-04 0:59 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-08 14:24 ` Shen, Yijun
2024-05-08 15:53 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-05-11 15:05 ` Shen, Yijun
2024-05-11 15:12 ` Limonciello, Mario
2024-05-11 15:56 ` Shen, Yijun
2024-05-12 17:53 ` Armin Wolf
2024-05-12 17:58 ` Limonciello, Mario
2024-05-12 18:47 ` Armin Wolf
2024-05-12 22:14 ` Limonciello, Mario [this message]
2024-05-11 16:02 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-09 15:10 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-11 1:49 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-11 15:22 ` Shen, Yijun
2024-05-11 15:54 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-11 16:12 ` Shen, Yijun
2024-05-11 2:36 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-11 2:36 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] platform/x86: dell-smbios: Add helper for checking supported commands Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-11 15:13 ` Limonciello, Mario
2024-05-12 18:00 ` Armin Wolf
2024-05-11 2:36 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] platform/x86: dell-laptop: Implement platform_profile Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-11 15:16 ` Limonciello, Mario
2024-05-11 15:59 ` Lyndon Sanche
[not found] ` <48JCDS.E4RT1F9DTKFU1@lyndeno.ca>
2024-05-12 1:43 ` Limonciello, Mario
2024-05-12 15:25 ` Hans de Goede
2024-05-12 0:14 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-12 18:05 ` Armin Wolf
2024-05-15 17:06 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-17 22:42 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] platform/x86: dell: " Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-17 22:42 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] platform/x86: dell-smbios: Add helper for checking supported class Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-17 22:42 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] platform/x86: dell-smbios: Move request functions for reuse Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-17 22:42 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] platform/x86: dell-pc: Implement platform_profile Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-27 9:39 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-05-28 16:16 ` Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-21 20:50 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] platform/x86: dell: " Mario Limonciello
2024-05-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v8 " Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] platform/x86: dell-smbios: Add helper for checking supported class Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] platform/x86: dell-smbios: Move request functions for reuse Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] platform/x86: dell-pc: Implement platform_profile Lyndon Sanche
2024-05-30 8:39 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-05-31 1:19 ` Lyndon Sanche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=24fa8cdd-4c7b-4ec2-bffd-ff80e190f5fa@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=Dell.Client.Kernel@dell.com \
--cc=W_Armin@gmx.de \
--cc=Yijun.Shen@dell.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=lsanche@lyndeno.ca \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox