From: "Moger, Babu" <bmoger@amd.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"patches@lists.linux.dev" <patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps: Fall back to total b/w if local b/w unavailable
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 18:20:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2504daf3-16fa-9474-e9c5-cd6aa99d4776@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231024181600.8270-1-tony.luck@intel.com>
Hi Tony,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 1:16 PM
> To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>; Reinette Chatre
> <reinette.chatre@intel.com>; Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>;
> Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>; Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>;
> x86@kernel.org
> Cc: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>; James Morse
> <james.morse@arm.com>; Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>; Moger, Babu
> <Babu.Moger@amd.com>; Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-doc@vger.kernel.org; patches@lists.linux.dev;
> Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps: Fall back to total b/w if local b/w
> unavailable
>
> On Intel the various resource director technology (RDT) features are all
> orthogonal and independently enumerated. Thus it is possible to have a system
> that provides "total" memory bandwidth measurements without providing
> "local" bandwidth measurements.
>
> If local bandwidth measurement is not available, do not give up on providing
> the "mba_MBps" feedback option completely, make the code fall back to using
> total bandwidth.
Is this customer requirement ?
What do you mean by " If local bandwidth measurement is not available" ?
Is the hardware supports only total bandwidth and not local?
It can get real ugly if we try to handle one special case.
thanks
Babu
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++----------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> index f136ac046851..3b9531cce807 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> @@ -418,6 +418,14 @@ static int __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, struct
> rmid_read *rr)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static struct mbm_state *get_mbm_data(struct rdt_domain *dom_mbm, int
> +rmid) {
> + if (is_mbm_local_enabled())
> + return &dom_mbm->mbm_local[rmid];
> +
> + return &dom_mbm->mbm_total[rmid];
> +}
> +
> /*
> * mbm_bw_count() - Update bw count from values previously read by
> * __mon_event_count().
> @@ -431,7 +439,7 @@ static int __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, struct
> rmid_read *rr)
> */
> static void mbm_bw_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr) {
> - struct mbm_state *m = &rr->d->mbm_local[rmid];
> + struct mbm_state *m = get_mbm_data(rr->d, rmid);
> u64 cur_bw, bytes, cur_bytes;
>
> cur_bytes = rr->val;
> @@ -526,14 +534,14 @@ static void update_mba_bw(struct rdtgroup *rgrp,
> struct rdt_domain *dom_mbm)
> struct list_head *head;
> struct rdtgroup *entry;
>
> - if (!is_mbm_local_enabled())
> + if (!is_mbm_enabled())
> return;
>
> r_mba = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA].r_resctrl;
>
> closid = rgrp->closid;
> rmid = rgrp->mon.rmid;
> - pmbm_data = &dom_mbm->mbm_local[rmid];
> + pmbm_data = get_mbm_data(dom_mbm, rmid);
>
> dom_mba = get_domain_from_cpu(smp_processor_id(), r_mba);
> if (!dom_mba) {
> @@ -553,7 +561,7 @@ static void update_mba_bw(struct rdtgroup *rgrp,
> struct rdt_domain *dom_mbm)
> */
> head = &rgrp->mon.crdtgrp_list;
> list_for_each_entry(entry, head, mon.crdtgrp_list) {
> - cmbm_data = &dom_mbm->mbm_local[entry->mon.rmid];
> + cmbm_data = get_mbm_data(dom_mbm, entry->mon.rmid);
> cur_bw += cmbm_data->prev_bw;
> delta_bw += cmbm_data->delta_bw;
> }
> @@ -595,7 +603,7 @@ static void update_mba_bw(struct rdtgroup *rgrp,
> struct rdt_domain *dom_mbm)
> */
> pmbm_data->delta_comp = true;
> list_for_each_entry(entry, head, mon.crdtgrp_list) {
> - cmbm_data = &dom_mbm->mbm_local[entry->mon.rmid];
> + cmbm_data = get_mbm_data(dom_mbm, entry->mon.rmid);
> cmbm_data->delta_comp = true;
> }
> }
> @@ -621,15 +629,15 @@ static void mbm_update(struct rdt_resource *r, struct
> rdt_domain *d, int rmid)
> rr.evtid = QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID;
> rr.val = 0;
> __mon_event_count(rmid, &rr);
> -
> - /*
> - * Call the MBA software controller only for the
> - * control groups and when user has enabled
> - * the software controller explicitly.
> - */
> - if (is_mba_sc(NULL))
> - mbm_bw_count(rmid, &rr);
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * Call the MBA software controller only for the
> + * control groups and when user has enabled
> + * the software controller explicitly.
> + */
> + if (is_mba_sc(NULL))
> + mbm_bw_count(rmid, &rr);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index 69a1de92384a..0c4f8a1b8df0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -2294,7 +2294,7 @@ static bool supports_mba_mbps(void) {
> struct rdt_resource *r =
> &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA].r_resctrl;
>
> - return (is_mbm_local_enabled() &&
> + return (is_mbm_enabled() &&
> r->alloc_capable && is_mba_linear()); }
>
> --
> 2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-24 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-24 18:16 [PATCH] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps: Fall back to total b/w if local b/w unavailable Tony Luck
2023-10-24 18:24 ` Luck, Tony
2023-10-24 23:20 ` Moger, Babu [this message]
2023-10-24 23:43 ` Luck, Tony
2023-10-25 16:01 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 12:46 ` Peter Newman
2023-10-25 19:38 ` Tony Luck
2023-10-25 20:39 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 20:42 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 20:52 ` Tony Luck
2023-10-25 23:41 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-26 0:07 ` Luck, Tony
2023-10-25 21:06 ` Peter Newman
2023-10-26 13:55 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-26 16:09 ` Luck, Tony
2023-10-26 17:19 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-26 19:54 ` Tony Luck
2023-10-25 23:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Tony Luck
2023-10-26 20:02 ` [PATCH v3] " Tony Luck
2023-10-26 22:40 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-26 22:59 ` Luck, Tony
2023-11-03 21:43 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-03 21:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-07 21:15 ` Tony Luck
2023-11-08 21:49 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-09 21:27 ` Luck, Tony
2023-11-15 16:09 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-15 21:54 ` Tony Luck
2023-11-16 19:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-28 23:14 ` [PATCH v4] x86/resctrl: Add mount option to pick total MBM event Tony Luck
2023-11-29 23:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-01 20:45 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-01 21:47 ` [PATCH v5] x86/resctrl: Add event choices for mba_MBps Tony Luck
2023-12-04 16:24 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-04 18:16 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-04 19:04 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-04 19:45 ` Luck, Tony
2023-12-04 20:03 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-04 21:08 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-04 22:15 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-04 22:51 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-07 19:56 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps enhancements Tony Luck
2023-12-07 19:56 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] x86/resctrl: Add mount option "mba_MBps_event" Tony Luck
2023-12-08 18:17 ` Peter Newman
2023-12-08 21:57 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-08 22:09 ` Peter Newman
2023-12-08 22:37 ` Luck, Tony
2023-12-12 17:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-12 20:02 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-12 21:42 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-13 1:07 ` Luck, Tony
2023-12-08 18:29 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-08 21:50 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-12 18:59 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-07 19:56 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] x86/resctrl: Use total bandwidth for mba_MBps option when local isn't present Tony Luck
2023-12-08 18:26 ` Peter Newman
2023-12-07 19:56 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] x86/resctrl: Add new "mba_MBps_event" mount option to documentation Tony Luck
2023-12-08 19:22 ` Peter Newman
2023-12-12 18:59 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-09 22:00 ` [PATCH] x86/resctrl: Implement new MBA_mbps throttling heuristic Tony Luck
2024-01-16 19:55 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-17 3:36 ` Xiaochen Shen
2024-01-17 3:40 ` Xiaochen Shen
2024-01-18 0:26 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-18 21:42 ` [PATCH v2] x86/resctrl: Implement new mba_MBps " Tony Luck
2024-01-22 17:34 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-22 18:07 ` Luck, Tony
2024-01-22 18:18 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-22 18:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-01-22 18:41 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-22 18:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-01-22 20:58 ` Luck, Tony
2024-01-23 12:12 ` James Morse
2024-01-23 17:07 ` Luck, Tony
2024-01-24 0:29 ` Tony Luck
2024-01-25 17:29 ` Tony Luck
2024-01-22 18:08 ` [PATCH v3] " Tony Luck
2024-01-24 10:42 ` [tip: x86/cache] " tip-bot2 for Tony Luck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2504daf3-16fa-9474-e9c5-cd6aa99d4776@amd.com \
--to=bmoger@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox