From: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jonas Dreßler" <verdre@v0yd.nl>,
"Amitkumar Karwar" <amitkarwar@gmail.com>,
"Ganapathi Bhat" <ganapathi.bhat@nxp.com>,
"Xinming Hu" <huxinming820@gmail.com>,
"Kalle Valo" <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Tsuchiya Yuto" <kitakar@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mwifiex: pcie: add reset_d3cold quirk for Surface gen4+ devices
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 21:27:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <251bd696-9029-ec5a-8b0c-da78a0c8b2eb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210709184443.fxcbc77te6ptypar@pali>
On 7/9/21 8:44 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
[...]
>> My (very) quick attempt ('echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/.../reset) at
>> reproducing this didn't work, so I think at very least a network
>> connection needs to be active.
>
> This is doing PCIe function level reset. Maybe you can get more luck
> with PCIe Hot Reset. See following link how to trigger PCIe Hot Reset
> from userspace: https://alexforencich.com/wiki/en/pcie/hot-reset-linux
Thanks for that link! That does indeed do something which breaks the
adapter. Running the script produces
[ 178.388414] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: PREP_CMD: card is removed
[ 178.389128] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: PREP_CMD: card is removed
[ 178.461365] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: performing cancel_work_sync()...
[ 178.461373] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: cancel_work_sync() done
[ 178.984106] pci 0000:01:00.0: [11ab:2b38] type 00 class 0x020000
[ 178.984161] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff 64bit pref]
[ 178.984193] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x18: [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff 64bit pref]
[ 178.984430] pci 0000:01:00.0: supports D1 D2
[ 178.984434] pci 0000:01:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D3hot D3cold
[ 178.984871] pcieport 0000:00:1c.0: ASPM: current common clock configuration is inconsistent, reconfiguring
[ 179.297919] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xd4400000-0xd44fffff 64bit pref]
[ 179.297961] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: assigned [mem 0xd4500000-0xd45fffff 64bit pref]
[ 179.298316] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
[ 179.298752] mwifiex_pcie: PCI memory map Virt0: 00000000c4593df1 PCI memory map Virt2: 0000000039d67daf
[ 179.300522] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: WLAN read winner status failed!
[ 179.300552] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: info: _mwifiex_fw_dpc: unregister device
[ 179.300622] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: Read register failed
[ 179.300912] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: performing cancel_work_sync()...
[ 179.300928] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: cancel_work_sync() done
after which the card is unusable (there is no WiFi interface availabel
any more). Reloading the driver module doesn't help and produces
[ 376.906833] mwifiex_pcie: PCI memory map Virt0: 0000000025149d28 PCI memory map Virt2: 00000000c4593df1
[ 376.907278] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: WLAN read winner status failed!
[ 376.907281] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: info: _mwifiex_fw_dpc: unregister device
[ 376.907293] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: Read register failed
[ 376.907404] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: performing cancel_work_sync()...
[ 376.907406] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: cancel_work_sync() done
again. Performing a function level reset produces
[ 402.489572] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: mwifiex_pcie_reset_prepare: adapter structure is not valid
[ 403.514219] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: mwifiex_pcie_reset_done: adapter structure is not valid
and doesn't help either.
Running the same command on a kernel with (among other) this patch
unfortunately also breaks the adapter in the same way. As far as I can
tell though, it doesn't run through the reset code added by this patch
(as indicated by the log message when performing FLR), which I assume
in a non-forced scenario, e.g. firmware issues (which IIRC is why this
patch exists), it would?
>> Unfortunately I can't test that with a
>> network connection (and without compiling a custom kernel for which I
>> don't have the time right now) because there's currently another bug
>> deadlocking on device removal if there's an active connection during
>> removal (which also seems to trigger on reset). That one ill be fixed
>> by
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20210515024227.2159311-1-briannorris@chromium.org/
>>
>> Jonas might know more.
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-09 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-09 14:58 [PATCH v2 0/2] mwifiex: Add quirks for MS Surface devices Jonas Dreßler
2021-07-09 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mwifiex: pcie: add DMI-based quirk implementation for " Jonas Dreßler
2021-07-31 8:50 ` Kalle Valo
2021-07-09 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mwifiex: pcie: add reset_d3cold quirk for Surface gen4+ devices Jonas Dreßler
2021-07-09 15:18 ` Pali Rohár
2021-07-09 15:33 ` Jonas Dreßler
2021-07-09 16:12 ` Pali Rohár
2021-07-09 17:03 ` Maximilian Luz
2021-07-09 17:30 ` Pali Rohár
2021-07-09 18:16 ` Maximilian Luz
2021-07-09 18:44 ` Pali Rohár
2021-07-09 19:27 ` Maximilian Luz [this message]
2021-07-09 19:44 ` Pali Rohár
2021-07-09 20:54 ` Maximilian Luz
2021-07-09 21:25 ` Pali Rohár
2021-07-09 22:25 ` Maximilian Luz
2021-07-09 22:54 ` Pali Rohár
2021-07-10 0:00 ` Maximilian Luz
2021-07-10 0:07 ` Pali Rohár
2021-07-10 0:18 ` Maximilian Luz
2021-07-10 0:38 ` Pali Rohár
2021-07-10 1:07 ` Maximilian Luz
2021-07-11 16:53 ` Jonas Dreßler
2021-07-11 17:01 ` Pali Rohár
2021-07-11 16:31 ` Jonas Dreßler
2021-07-09 16:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-09 16:31 ` Pali Rohár
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=251bd696-9029-ec5a-8b0c-da78a0c8b2eb@gmail.com \
--to=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
--cc=amitkarwar@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ganapathi.bhat@nxp.com \
--cc=huxinming820@gmail.com \
--cc=kitakar@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=verdre@v0yd.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox