Re: OSDL Bug 3770

["Loic Domaigne" <loic-dev@gmx.net>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii", Size: 1079 bytes --]

Hello Nick, 

> >Does Linux tolerate hard CPU binding? By hard CPU binding, I mean 
> >that the application tells the scheduler "I want to run there", 
> >and the scheduler schedules the thread(s) "there" regardless if it 
> >makes sense or not ( The decision is left to the application). 
> 
> Yes, it does support hard CPU binding - sched_setaffinity

Yes, I believe that /sched_setaffinity()/ offers a practical solution to the
problem we are faced. 

But I am eager to try the RT-patchset of Ingo. 


> [snip interesting dialogue]
> 
> Thanks for your detailed comments, they were interesting.

... Glad to hear. You're welcome!  



Cheers,  
Loic. 

-- 
--
// Sender address goes to /dev/null (!!) 
// Use my 32/64 bits, ANSI C89, compliant email-address instead:   

unsigned y[]=
{0,34432,26811,16721,41866,63119,61007,48155,26147,10986};
void x(z){putchar(z);}; unsigned t; 
main(i){if(i<10){t=(y[i]*47560)%65521;x(t>>8);x(t&255);main(++i);}}

+++ Sparen Sie mit GMX DSL +++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
AKTION für Wechsler: DSL-Tarife ab 3,99 EUR/Monat + Startguthaben