From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752646Ab0EXO2o (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2010 10:28:44 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39805 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750869Ab0EXO2n (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2010 10:28:43 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20100521093552.e4a77963.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20100521093552.e4a77963.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100323144836.GA10420@redhat.com> <22494.1274436496@redhat.com> To: Andrew Morton Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Oleg Nesterov , Peter Zijlstra , Roland McGrath , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 0/2] misc: don't use sig->count Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 15:28:22 +0100 Message-ID: <25350.1274711302@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > Sure, unless there's a reason not to do this? Not that I know of. I was just checking (I'd like to get them out of my patch stack one way or another). David