From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>
Cc: Bart Trojanowski <bart@jukie.net>,
Manoj Sontakke <manojs@sasken.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: which gcc version?
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 13:26:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25567.986473592@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010405150219.B873@mea-ext.zmailer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010405150219.B873@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0104051930580.2687-100000@pcc65.sasi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0104050732080.13246-100000@localhost>
matti.aarnio@zmailer.org said:
> To think of it, there really should be explicitely callable
> versions of these with LinuxKernel names for them, not gcc
> builtins. That way people would *know* they are doing
> something, which is potentially very slow.
> (And the API would not change from underneath them.)
Like include/asm-*/div64.h::do_div()?
--
dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-05 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-05 10:56 which gcc version? Manoj Sontakke
2001-04-05 5:48 ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-05 14:09 ` Manoj Sontakke
2001-04-05 11:37 ` Bart Trojanowski
2001-04-05 12:02 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-04-05 12:26 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2001-04-05 12:31 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-04-05 13:09 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-04-05 11:45 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-04-05 11:50 ` christophe barbe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-23 12:53 Which " Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-23 12:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-11-23 13:51 ` war
2001-11-23 19:43 ` J Sloan
2001-11-23 13:59 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-23 14:11 ` war
2001-11-23 15:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-11-23 15:30 ` Gábor Lénárt
2001-11-23 15:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-11-23 19:50 ` J Sloan
2001-11-23 20:34 ` John Jasen
2001-11-23 21:55 ` J Sloan
2001-11-24 3:08 ` John Jasen
2001-11-24 12:24 ` Paul G. Allen
2001-11-26 18:31 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-27 8:42 ` Ahmed Masud
2001-11-23 16:10 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-23 14:43 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-23 16:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-11-23 18:30 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-23 18:56 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-23 19:28 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-23 20:14 ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-23 20:24 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-23 20:35 ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-23 21:09 ` David Weinehall
2001-11-24 16:01 ` Luigi Genoni
2001-11-24 16:09 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-24 17:32 ` Luigi Genoni
2001-11-23 17:12 RaúlNúñez de Arenas Coronado
2001-11-23 18:02 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2001-11-23 18:14 ` Thorsten Glaser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25567.986473592@redhat.com \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=bart@jukie.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manojs@sasken.com \
--cc=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox