From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965154AbXCPOX3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:23:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965138AbXCPOX3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:23:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:55095 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965119AbXCPOX1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:23:27 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20070316151305.04cbc352@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> References: <20070316151305.04cbc352@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20070316125008.3740.44693.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> To: Alan Cox Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, herbert.xu@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, arjan@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] AF_RXRPC socket family implementation [try #2] X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50 Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:23:13 +0000 Message-ID: <25571.1174054993@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > If your messages are datagrams and unreliable -> SOCK_DGRAM Nope. > If your messages are datagrams and reliable -> SOCK_RDM Nope. > If your messages are datagrams, reliable and ordered -> SOCK_SEQPACKET Nope. > If your messages are streams of bits, reliable and ordered -> SOCK_STREAM Nope. David