public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Svetoslav Slavtchev" <svetljo@gmx.de>
To: William Park <opengeometry@yahoo.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Multiple keyboard/monitor vs linux-2.6?
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 02:05:13 +0100 (MET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <25596.1071277513@www59.gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20031212234627.GA1256@node1.opengeometry.net

> On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 12:09:05AM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> > if you just want muliple X users bruby/ ruby should work as stable as
> > 2.4 /2.6 (works at least for 20-25 people i helped, reading the howto
> > and getting it up),
> > 
> > but if you want multiple virtual terminals, you'll have to experiment
> :-)
> > and read a lot the linuxconsole ml, as it's not yet documented 
> 
> Multiple X users (via xdm login) is what I'm looking for.  X-terminal is
> the canonical answer.  In the light of recent development in PXE support
> which effectively eliminated third-party packages like Etherboot,
> Netboot, Rom-a-matic, and LTSP,  I was wondering if it's possible to go
> the next logical step and eliminate motherboard/case as well.
> 
> This would be ideal for home market, where you want multiple users (ie.
> kids) but with only one PC.  Sell it as "Linux Mainframe"... :-)

it should be doable, although it would be easier to setup
if all the ruby PC's used a basic local installation and load everything
else
from a LTSP server

i wanted to try it, but i own a single PC, so ...

best,

svetljo

-- 
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net



  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-13  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-12 22:27 Multiple keyboard/monitor vs linux-2.6? Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-12-12 22:45 ` William Park
2003-12-12 23:09   ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-12-12 23:46     ` William Park
2003-12-13  1:05       ` Svetoslav Slavtchev [this message]
2003-12-13 10:20       ` John Bradford
2003-12-13 10:28         ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
     [not found] <fa.da53dsa.dho216@ifi.uio.no>
2003-12-12 21:43 ` William Park
2003-12-13 13:14   ` Helge Hafting
2003-12-13 21:12     ` William Park
2003-12-15 12:18       ` Helge Hafting
2003-12-15 20:38         ` William Park
2003-12-15 17:18       ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-12 10:03 Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-12-12  9:12 Boszormenyi Zoltan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=25596.1071277513@www59.gmx.net \
    --to=svetljo@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=opengeometry@yahoo.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox