From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>,
LMML <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
DLOS <davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] media: davinci: vpif_capture: move the freeing of irq and global variables to remove()
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 04:32:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2564718.Z6XYOtT7FL@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369569612-30915-5-git-send-email-prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Hi Prabhakar,
Thanks for the patch.
On Sunday 26 May 2013 17:30:07 Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> From: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
>
> Ideally the freeing of irq's and the global variables needs to be
> done in the remove() rather than module_exit(), this patch moves
> the freeing up of irq's and freeing the memory allocated to channel
> objects to remove() callback of struct platform_driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c | 31 ++++++++++------------
> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c index caaf4fe..f8b7304
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> @@ -2225,17 +2225,29 @@ vpif_int_err:
> */
> static int vpif_remove(struct platform_device *device)
> {
> - int i;
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> struct channel_obj *ch;
> + struct resource *res;
> + int irq_num, i = 0;
> +
> + pdev = container_of(vpif_dev, struct platform_device, dev);
As Sergei mentioned, the platform device is already passed to the function as
an argument.
> + while ((res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, i))) {
> + for (irq_num = res->start; irq_num <= res->end; irq_num++)
> + free_irq(irq_num,
> + (void *)(&vpif_obj.dev[i]->channel_id));
A quick look at board code shows that each IRQ resource contains a single IRQ.
The second loop could thus be removed. You could also add another patch to
perform similar cleanup for the probe code.
> + i++;
> + }
>
> v4l2_device_unregister(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev);
>
> + kfree(vpif_obj.sd);
> /* un-register device */
> for (i = 0; i < VPIF_CAPTURE_MAX_DEVICES; i++) {
> /* Get the pointer to the channel object */
> ch = vpif_obj.dev[i];
> /* Unregister video device */
> video_unregister_device(ch->video_dev);
> + kfree(vpif_obj.dev[i]);
> }
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -2347,24 +2359,7 @@ static __init int vpif_init(void)
> */
> static void vpif_cleanup(void)
> {
> - struct platform_device *pdev;
> - struct resource *res;
> - int irq_num;
> - int i = 0;
> -
> - pdev = container_of(vpif_dev, struct platform_device, dev);
> - while ((res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, i))) {
> - for (irq_num = res->start; irq_num <= res->end; irq_num++)
> - free_irq(irq_num,
> - (void *)(&vpif_obj.dev[i]->channel_id));
> - i++;
> - }
> -
> platform_driver_unregister(&vpif_driver);
> -
> - kfree(vpif_obj.sd);
> - for (i = 0; i < VPIF_CAPTURE_MAX_DEVICES; i++)
> - kfree(vpif_obj.dev[i]);
> }
>
> /* Function for module initialization and cleanup */
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-29 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-26 12:00 [PATCH v3 0/9] media: davinci: vpif trivial cleanup Prabhakar Lad
2013-05-26 12:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] media: davinci: vpif: remove unwanted header mach/hardware.h and sort the includes alphabetically Prabhakar Lad
2013-05-26 12:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] media: davinci: vpif: Convert to devm_* api Prabhakar Lad
2013-05-26 14:37 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-05-26 12:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] media: davinci: vpif: remove unnecessary braces around defines Prabhakar Lad
2013-05-26 12:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] media: davinci: vpif_capture: move the freeing of irq and global variables to remove() Prabhakar Lad
2013-05-26 14:47 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-05-29 2:32 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2013-05-29 4:14 ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-05-26 12:00 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] media: davinci: vpif_capture: use module_platform_driver() Prabhakar Lad
2013-05-29 3:34 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-26 12:00 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] media: davinci: vpif_capture: Convert to devm_* api Prabhakar Lad
2013-05-29 3:37 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-26 12:00 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] media: davinci: vpif_display: move the freeing of irq and global variables to remove() Prabhakar Lad
2013-05-26 12:00 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] media: davinci: vpif_display: use module_platform_driver() Prabhakar Lad
2013-05-29 3:34 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-26 12:00 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] media: davinci: vpif_display: Convert to devm_* api Prabhakar Lad
2013-05-29 3:38 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-29 4:15 ` Prabhakar Lad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2564718.Z6XYOtT7FL@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com \
--cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox