public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Till Immanuel Patzschke <tip@inw.de>,
	lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?!
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:47:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <25840000.1040258855@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E0116D6.35CA202A@inw.de>

> as part of my project I need to run a very high number of processes/threads on a
> linux machine.  Right now I have a Dual-PIII 1.4G w/ 8GB RAM -- I am running
> 4000 processes w/ 2-3 threads each totaling in a process count of 15000+
> processes (since Linux doesn't really distinguish between threads and
> processes...).
> Once I pass the 10000 (+/-) pocesses load increases drastically (on startup,
> although it returns to normal), however the system time (on one processor)
> reaches for 54% (12061 procs) while the only non sleeping process is top -- the
> system is basically doing nothing (except scheduling the "nothing" which
> consumes significant system time).
> Is there anything I can do to reduce that system load/time?  (I haven't been
> able to exactly define the "line" but it definitly gets worse the more processes
> need to be handled.)

You don't even specify what kernel you're using ...

> Does any of the patchsets address this particular problem?

Read the linux-kernel archives.

M.


  reply	other threads:[~2002-12-19  0:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-19  0:46 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Till Immanuel Patzschke
2002-12-19  0:47 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2002-12-19  0:53 ` Till Immanuel Patzschke
2002-12-19  1:15   ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19  1:12     ` David Lang
2002-12-19  1:25       ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19  1:20         ` David Lang
2002-12-19  1:36           ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19  1:42           ` Robert Love
2002-12-19  1:44             ` David Lang
2002-12-19  2:05               ` [Lse-tech] " William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 15:05                 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-12-19 10:27                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 10:37                     ` Alex Tomas
2002-12-19 10:55                       ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 15:24                       ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-19 15:15                     ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-12-19  1:24     ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19  0:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-12-19  1:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 14:59 ` Denis Vlasenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=25840000.1040258855@flay \
    --to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=tip@inw.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox