public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Americo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Create initial stack independent of PAGE_SIZE
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:02:16 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2593.1265965336@neuling.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100212161305.73B2.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>

In message <20100212161305.73B2.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> you wrote:
> > Currently we create the initial stack based on the PAGE_SIZE.  This is
> > unnecessary.  
> 
> I don't think this is enough explanation. In past mail, you described
> why page size dependency is harmful. I hope you add it into the patch
> description.

I don't think it's harmful, it's just irrelevant.  Stack size is
independent of page size.  

> IOW, we don't need to change the unnecessary-but-non-harmful behavior.
> 
> > 
> > This creates this initial stack independent of the PAGE_SIZE.
> > 
> > It also bumps up the number of 4k pages allocated from 20 to 32, to
> > align with 64K page systems.
> 
> Why do we need page-aligning? Do you mean this code doesn't works on
> 128K (or more larger) page systems?

If the "random" setting is not a common multiple of the 4k and 64k
pages, they will end up getting aligned differently, hence causing what
we are trying to avoid in the first place with this patch.

I should probably add this as a comment in the code comment?

Mikey

> 
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
> > ---
> > This is the second half of my original patch. This can be targeted for
> > 2.6.34 as it's just a cleanup.
> > 
> > Tested on PPC64 with 4k and 64k pages.
> > 
> >  fs/exec.c |    4 +---
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Index: linux-2.6-ozlabs/fs/exec.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6-ozlabs.orig/fs/exec.c
> > +++ linux-2.6-ozlabs/fs/exec.c
> > @@ -554,8 +554,6 @@ static int shift_arg_pages(struct vm_are
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -#define EXTRA_STACK_VM_PAGES	20	/* random */
> > -
> >  /*
> >   * Finalizes the stack vm_area_struct. The flags and permissions are updat
ed,
> >   * the stack is optionally relocated, and some extra space is added.
> > @@ -630,7 +628,7 @@ int setup_arg_pages(struct linux_binprm 
> >  			goto out_unlock;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	stack_expand = EXTRA_STACK_VM_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE;
> > +	stack_expand = 131072UL; /* randomly 32*4k (or 2*64k) pages */
> >  	stack_size = vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start;
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Align this down to a page boundary as expand_stack
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-12  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-06  0:43 Stack size protection broken on ppc64 Michael Neuling
2010-02-06  4:20 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-02-06 10:22   ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-08  0:04     ` Anton Blanchard
2010-02-08  0:07     ` [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit Michael Neuling
2010-02-08  0:28       ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-08  5:06       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08  5:11         ` Anton Blanchard
2010-02-08  5:22           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08  5:31             ` Anton Blanchard
2010-02-08  6:11               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08  5:37             ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-08  6:05               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08  7:07                 ` Américo Wang
2010-02-08  7:11                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-09  6:11                     ` [PATCH] Restrict initial stack space expansion " Michael Neuling
2010-02-09  6:46                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-09  8:59                         ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-09 21:25                           ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-09 21:51                             ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-09 22:27                               ` Helge Deller
2010-02-10  5:12                                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-10  5:30                                   ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-10  5:31                                   ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-11 22:16                                     ` Helge Deller
2010-02-11 22:22                                       ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-12  5:44                             ` [PATCH] Create initial stack independent of PAGE_SIZE Michael Neuling
2010-02-12  7:20                               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-12  9:02                                 ` Michael Neuling [this message]
2010-02-12  9:51                                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08 10:45                 ` [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit Michael Neuling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2593.1265965336@neuling.org \
    --to=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox