From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Muhammad Bilal <meatuni001@gmail.com>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
hdegoede@redhat.com, jorge.lopez2@hp.com,
Thomas.Weissschuh@linutronix.de, superm1@kernel.org,
W_Armin@gmx.de, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] platform/x86: hp-bioscfg: bound ordered-list parsing by the package count
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 13:58:38 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25a18f2d-ce84-ad42-a779-54cec281a89c@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707202111.35414-3-meatuni001@gmail.com>
On Wed, 8 Jul 2026, Muhammad Bilal wrote:
> hp_populate_ordered_list_elements_from_package() differs from the other
> per-type parsers: its main loop is bounded only by the fixed per-type
> count and never checks elem against the number of elements actually
> present in the package,
>
> for (elem = 1, eloc = 1; eloc < ORD_ELEM_CNT; elem++, eloc++)
>
> whereas the string, integer, enumeration and password parsers bound
> their main loop with "elem < count" as well.
>
> This is safe today because hp_init_bios_package_attribute() rejects any
> package with fewer than ORD_ELEM_CNT elements before the parser runs. A
> later patch relaxes that check to accept shorter packages;
An upcoming change, however, relaxes ...
> once this
> loop can be handed fewer than ORD_ELEM_CNT elements it indexes
> order_obj[elem] past the end of the array - an out-of-bounds heap read.
I don't think we need this part of the explanation, it will never happen
as you're fixing it beforehand. :-) So please drop it as unnecessary
detail.
It's pretty obvious to kernel developers anyway if there's a runaway index
so there's no big need in general to tell too simple basics like that.
> Bound the loop by the validated element count as well, so it stops at
> whichever comes first, the per-type count or the real package size,
>
> for (elem = 1, eloc = 1; eloc < ORD_ELEM_CNT && elem < order_obj_count;
> elem++, eloc++)
>
> order_obj_count is the validated count plumbed in by the previous
> patch. No functional change for packages that enumerate correctly
> today.
>
> Fixes: a34fc329b189 ("platform/x86: hp-bioscfg: bioscfg")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal <meatuni001@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp-bioscfg/order-list-attributes.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp-bioscfg/order-list-attributes.c b/drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp-bioscfg/order-list-attributes.c
> index 83ddf99f93954..a50d074125268 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp-bioscfg/order-list-attributes.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp-bioscfg/order-list-attributes.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int hp_populate_ordered_list_elements_from_package(union acpi_object *ord
> if (!order_obj)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - for (elem = 1, eloc = 1; eloc < ORD_ELEM_CNT; elem++, eloc++) {
> + for (elem = 1, eloc = 1; eloc < ORD_ELEM_CNT && elem < order_obj_count; elem++, eloc++) {
>
> switch (order_obj[elem].type) {
> case ACPI_TYPE_STRING:
>
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 20:21 [PATCH v3 0/4] platform/x86: hp-bioscfg: fix ACPI package handling on HP EliteBook 840 G2 Muhammad Bilal
2026-07-07 20:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] platform/x86: hp-bioscfg: pass validated element count to package parsers Muhammad Bilal
2026-07-08 10:54 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-07-07 20:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] platform/x86: hp-bioscfg: bound ordered-list parsing by the package count Muhammad Bilal
2026-07-08 10:58 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2026-07-07 20:21 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] platform/x86: hp-bioscfg: accept reduced ACPI packages from older HP BIOS Muhammad Bilal
2026-07-07 20:21 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] platform/x86: hp-bioscfg: warn on element type mismatch instead of failing Muhammad Bilal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25a18f2d-ce84-ad42-a779-54cec281a89c@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Thomas.Weissschuh@linutronix.de \
--cc=W_Armin@gmx.de \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jorge.lopez2@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meatuni001@gmail.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=superm1@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox