public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, petkan@mip-labs.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 00:37:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26253.1452559026@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452279264.2651.7.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> > The kernel may add implicitly trusted keys to a trusted-only keyring by
> > asserting KEY_ALLOC_BYPASS_RESTRICTION when the key is created, but
> > otherwise the key will only be allowed to be added to the keyring if it can
> > be verified.  The system trusted keyring is not then special in this sense
> > and other trusted keyrings can be set up that are wholly independent of
> > it.
>
> In order to have a certificate chain of trust on any of these trusted
> keyrings, the system keyring needs to be special.  Even if we permit
> transitive trust, meaning keys on a keyring can be used to validate
> other keys being added to the same keyring, the first key added to a
> trusted keyring needs to be vetted against something.  That something
> needs to be the builtin keys on the system keyring.

Note that the KEY_ALLOC_BYPASS_RESTRICTION flag is there to permit built in
keys to be added by the kernel in the first place.  It would not be available
to userspace to use.

David

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-12  0:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-08 18:33 [RFC PATCH 00/15] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings David Howells
2016-01-08 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH 01/15] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells
2016-01-08 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH 02/15] X.509: Don't treat self-signed keys specially David Howells
2016-01-08 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH 03/15] KEYS: Generalise system_verify_data() to provide access to internal content David Howells
2016-01-08 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH 04/15] PKCS#7: Make trust determination dependent on contents of trust keyring David Howells
2016-01-08 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH 05/15] KEYS: Add an alloc flag to convey the builtinness of a key David Howells
2016-01-08 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH 06/15] KEYS: Add a facility to restrict new links into a keyring David Howells
2016-01-08 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH 07/15] KEYS: Allow authentication data to be stored in an asymmetric key David Howells
2016-01-08 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] KEYS: Add identifier pointers to public_key_signature struct David Howells
2016-01-08 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH 09/15] X.509: Retain the key verification data David Howells
2016-01-08 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH 10/15] X.509: Extract signature digest and make self-signed cert checks earlier David Howells
2016-01-08 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH 11/15] PKCS#7: Make the signature a pointer rather than embedding it David Howells
2016-01-08 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH 12/15] X.509: Move the trust validation code out to its own file David Howells
2016-01-08 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH 13/15] KEYS: Generalise x509_request_asymmetric_key() David Howells
2016-01-08 18:35 ` [RFC PATCH 14/15] KEYS: Move the point of trust determination to __key_link() David Howells
2016-01-08 18:35 ` [RFC PATCH 15/15] KEYS: Remove KEY_FLAG_TRUSTED David Howells
2016-01-08 18:54 ` [RFC PATCH 00/15] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings Mimi Zohar
2016-01-08 19:18   ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-12  0:38     ` David Howells
2016-01-12  2:43       ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-12  0:37   ` David Howells [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26253.1452559026@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=petkan@mip-labs.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox