public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, baolin.wang7@gmail.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: PCI: Validate the node before setting node id for root bus
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 23:41:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26284ca5-ea05-0496-629d-9951f49dda8f@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200928152326.GA15640@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

Hi,

在 2020/9/28 23:23, Lorenzo Pieralisi 写道:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:49:57PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:00:55PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> [+ Lorenzo]
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 06:33:24PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>>> If the BIOS disabled the NUMA configuration, but did not change the
>>>> proximity domain description in the SRAT table, so the PCI root bus
>>>> device may get a incorrect node id by acpi_get_node().
>>>
>>> How "incorrect" are we talking here? What actually goes wrong? At some
>>> point, we have to trust what the firmware is telling us.
>>
>> What I mean is, if we disable the NUMA from BIOS
> 
> Please define what this means ie are you removing SRAT from ACPI static
> tables ?

Yes.

> 
>> but we did not change the PXM for the PCI devices,
> 
> If a _PXM maps to a proximity domain that is not described in the SRAT
> your firmware is buggy.

Sorry for confusing, that's not what I mean. When the BIOS disable the 
NUMA (remove the SRAT table), but the PCI devices' _PXM description is 
still available, which means we can still get the pxm from 
acpi_evaluate_integer() in this case.

So we can get below inconsistent log on ARM platform:
"No NUMA configuration found
PCI_bus 0000:00 on NUMA node 0
...
PCI_bus 0000:e3 on NUMA node 1"

On X86, the pci_acpi_root_get_node() will validate the node before 
setting the node id for root bus. So I think we can add this validation 
for ARM platform. Or anything else I missed?

> 
>> so the PCI devices can still get a numa node id from acpi_get_node().
>> For example, we can still get the numa node id = 1 in this case from
>> acpi_get_node(), but the numa_nodes_parsed is empty, which means the
>> node id 1 is invalid.  We should add a validation for the node id when
>> setting the root bus node id.
> 
> The kernel is not a firmware validation test suite, so fix the firmware
> please.
> 
> Having said that, please provide a trace log of the issue this is
> causing, if any.

See above.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-29 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-22 10:33 [PATCH] arm64: PCI: Validate the node before setting node id for root bus Baolin Wang
2020-09-28 14:00 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-28 14:49   ` Baolin Wang
2020-09-28 15:23     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-29 15:41       ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2020-10-01  8:55         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-10-03  9:35           ` Baolin Wang
2020-11-09 12:27             ` Baolin Wang
2020-11-12 17:05               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26284ca5-ea05-0496-629d-9951f49dda8f@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox