Re: [PATCH v5] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver

Jie Deng
2021-03-02T08:21:33Z

On 2021/3/2 12:22, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 02-03-21, 09:31, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 01-03-21, 16:19, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 7:41 AM Jie Deng <jie.deng@intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_i2c.h
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Linux-syscall-note */
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Definitions for virtio I2C Adpter
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2021 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_I2C_H
>>>> +#define _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_I2C_H
>>> Why is this a uapi header? Can't this all be moved into the driver
>>> itself?
>>>
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * struct virtio_i2c_req - the virtio I2C request structure
>>>> + * @out_hdr: the OUT header of the virtio I2C message
>>>> + * @write_buf: contains one I2C segment being written to the device
>>>> + * @read_buf: contains one I2C segment being read from the device
>>>> + * @in_hdr: the IN header of the virtio I2C message
>>>> + */
>>>> +struct virtio_i2c_req {
>>>> + struct virtio_i2c_out_hdr out_hdr;
>>>> + u8 *write_buf;
>>>> + u8 *read_buf;
>>>> + struct virtio_i2c_in_hdr in_hdr;
>>>> +};
>>> In particular, this structure looks like it is only ever usable between
>>> the transfer functions in the driver itself, it is shared with neither
>>> user space nor the virtio host side.
>> Why is it so ? Won't you expect hypervisors or userspace apps to use
>> these ?
> This comment applies only for the first two structures as the third
> one is never exchanged over virtio.
Yeah. Actually, the backend only needs "struct virtio_i2c_out_hdr out_hdr"
and "struct virtio_i2c_in_hdr in_hdr" for communication. So we only need
to keep
the first two in uapi and move "struct virtio_i2c_req" into the driver.

But Jason wanted to include "struct virtio_i2c_req" in uapi. He
explained in this link
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2020-October/050222.html.
Do you agree with that explanation ?