From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755298Ab1JQKk1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 06:40:27 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:9322 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751549Ab1JQKk0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 06:40:26 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <2150.1314882260@redhat.com> <5149.1317036720@redhat.com> <6324.1317308270@redhat.com> <12748.1317313818@redhat.com> <18003.1317336244@redhat.com> <6261.1317385734@redhat.com> <8905.1317984176@redhat.com> <9908.1318413! 955@redhat.com> <32454.1318519287@redhat.com> <17609.1318584129@redhat.com> To: Mark Moseley Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Linux filesystem caching discussion list , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Linux-cachefs] 3.0.3 64-bit Crash running fscache/cachefilesd Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:39:11 +0100 Message-ID: <26471.1318847951@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mark Moseley wrote: > Presumably it gets to bcull and stops storing but nothing's getting > pruned. I can see cachefilesd is in constant activity right now. > Looking at strace, maybe it can't find anything to prune because it > thinks it's all active. I'm seeing a constant loop that looks similar > to this: Yeah... The culling algorithm needs overhauling. I have most of a patch to do that, but I wanted to fix the bugs in the existing code before throwing a new set over the top. David