From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754795Ab1AGRMu (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2011 12:12:50 -0500 Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:38941 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754707Ab1AGRMs (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2011 12:12:48 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3-dev To: Joe Perches Cc: Krzysztof Halasa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] checkpatch: putting the && or || on the wrong line In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:38:38 PST." <1294349918.12561.142.camel@Joe-Laptop> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <20110104055900.GA5062@bicker> <20110104163836.GA30317@fieldses.org> <20110104164414.GX5875@const.bordeaux.inria.fr> <1294160834.6617.51.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1294249529.6617.118.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1294336674.12561.81.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1294347753.12561.106.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1294349918.12561.142.camel@Joe-Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1294420352_4860P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:12:32 -0500 Message-ID: <26590.1294420352@localhost> X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu 2 pass X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=neutral-1, source=Fixed, refid=n/a, actions=MAILHURDLE SPF TAG X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=vivi.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020201.4D274982.003C,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1294420352_4860P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:38:38 PST, Joe Perches said: > http://swerl.tudelft.nl/twiki/pub/Main/TechnicalReports/TUD-SERG-2009-008.pdf > > RQ2 Are files or modules with a higher violation > density more fault-prone? > > This holds for 10 rules in the standard, with some reserva- > tions. There is no reliable prediction for files without ac- > tive development (no changes) nor for files without viola- > tions. Also, the observed relation becomes less pronounced > in time, as the number of registered open faults decreases. In other words, code not written to style is like finding a brown M&M at a Van Halen concert... --==_Exmh_1294420352_4860P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFNJ0mAcC3lWbTT17ARAnojAJ0USWFnk/6547OkW2hR9BPzhuyGTQCdHVTW jl2gs/LWC3gRjWgoZbkFafc= =Za/k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1294420352_4860P--