From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752718Ab3ABLP6 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 2 Jan 2013 06:15:58 -0500
Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca ([24.71.223.10]:55532 "EHLO
	idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752654Ab3ABLP4 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 2 Jan 2013 06:15:56 -0500
X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true
X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=qT60hWcJq2tKMlwzTlfV91MSQCJjCwg5oP07qu3o0oU= c=1 sm=1
 a=0Z2zpp6RY3MA:10 a=TPbdJ-YLJ1kA:10 a=FGLzUi7B6sIA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10
 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=eeMGdU6VVFt2UVJcxx6VzA==:17 a=FgQmb5Bki9c5cQ4nxfQA:9
 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117
From: Daniel Phillips <lkml@phunq.net>
To: Tero Roponen <tero.roponen@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tux3 report: New news for the new year
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 03:15:57 -0800
Message-ID: <2665409.mugjWqk2Cd@mars>
Organization: tux3.org
User-Agent: KMail/4.9.3 (Linux/3.2.0-35-generic-pae; KDE/4.9.3; i686; ; )
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.03.1301021144280.10305@gmail.com>
References: <2597526.usDRg4h3X1@mars> <201301011537.08466.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <alpine.LFD.2.03.1301021144280.10305@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wednesday, January 02, 2013 11:45:29 AM Tero Roponen wrote:
> I have not looked at Tux3 for a long time, but there seems to be
> a simple fix for at least this problem, and two workarounds...

Wow, that was fast. Martin, does this work for you?

Regards,

Daniel