From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753447AbcADMVz (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 07:21:55 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.133]:57356 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751455AbcADMVu (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 07:21:50 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Mark Rutland Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Leif Lindholm , Kees Cook , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Sharma Bhupesh , Stuart Yoder Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] arm64: introduce KIMAGE_VADDR as the virtual base of the kernel region Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:21:05 +0100 Message-ID: <2697196.BQeEylXYbs@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160103145008.GA1642@svinekod> References: <1451301654-32019-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <11016384.rorhLcDd8i@wuerfel> <20160103145008.GA1642@svinekod> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:pqQyD4Cawn/XM4LGC2JMvjDHQFkQXdbRuEJMTrxub7J8XNYsiUk ZSfdzu8axSR3Mh0D7WmbMh471M6rF29+RYQp9TKevxUS2QdAqvN175J8nNRJBZQGkDtuH97 aG0CwAieQ3Z/Vala1AC2Uk9L82MuMYb0zsARy2X9yrzbfx3zij6SkAZE84WKBv8R1HM0VLR OP87dMbAUdeXeSNmG4Kdg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:QHgfqcPYuRo=:1GqNZSSon/ztOOrtXY0qL4 3TKFD1YbZKS8fmOSVe/T9M0iLtnE5iZ+PkpKSf5WHY0uG5AhQExU6TBS/gtY3I0pIG6lpPOox MApNyisO2pwI10IGAFdsyb10aCbkOnzZHgycVv6ufQEpn90+9PK6GL0dm2IHyiivKcczJ0tA5 yRkqP9T4N2K8jUzA+usxEygSgHfWLN4bEVmYxLJHwGQeWPNdiNHgIDEZrSpRRy2bXDCuKsnle KW3wim9QkX8NW725uv/vx5YQq0nr8MiMkRwI0q5I290sNvqiG+0nfCI9wa7Vn2V9G0N3kvA2b q7P2VoUlUWkYMOh1AzVIY/PovzxrP5K0xJlr5w4F9Ci3jD70baRzFYSG2RmIAq1txNhtiwizD 2mz9uahUjSaPrYfhTLWmTpQpkVoRdpigrTQjtQkQACVdxiYEaYv5SkNDQIZPr9IVL8ALD3GHl TEyZksH7S67/kqczDNtLZVR0wXfdW8InNfGm/EOfF6jL0ZCgauPCt2Ja5aO/HDUu/CPsBEZgi WEn57CWGpIawtgZqwxk8cRbG1m7ehco+/UVJkwOGXvlPcP6GJB/8yofFWSForuOrluV4lsMTU ps2Y42DEiVBgB/seL4TV3NB1DWhk7miSTLfAXwuZ/+5x8d8kRf4t6vmyhbFuWGsYk/otR+8B1 x932zpMFqBaHxxGGILvDjIBupeQJ7biyNB8+o2+awltd2lavnnS1p2Ylr+mm5dcVFS+/kaHjE FpNLX8PBX3BCOTDa Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 03 January 2016 14:50:10 Mark Rutland wrote: > > > - once we have a random number in the bootloader, we should also pass that > > through a DT property. This has been discussed multiple times in the past > > and I think we had reached consensus already but don't know if we had > > agreed on a specific DT property that contains the random number seed. > > Any links for this? I don't recall spotting this discussion. One discussion I found in the mail archives is in this thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/12/518, I also remember discussing it in person at some conference, obviously no archive of that. Arnd