* Re: Regression: Inoperative bluetooth, Intel chipset, mainline kernel 6.6.2+
[not found] <ee109942-ef8e-45b9-8cb9-a98a787fe094@moonlit-rail.com>
@ 2023-12-01 6:27 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-12-01 8:19 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2023-12-01 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kris Karas (Bug Reporting), Linux Bluetooth, Linux Regressions,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Marcel Holtmann, Johan Hedberg, Luiz Augusto von Dentz, Zach
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2499 bytes --]
[also Cc: original Bugzilla reporter]
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 08:54:09PM -0500, Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) wrote:
> Greetings -
>
> With mainline kernel 6.6.2+ (and 6.1.63, etc), bluetooth is inoperative
> (reports "opcode 0x0c03 failed") on my motherboard's bluetooth adapter
> (Intel chipset). Details below.
>
> I reported this in a comment tacked onto bugzilla #218142, but got no
> response, so posting here as a possibly new issue.
>
> Details, original email:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> I have a regression going from mainline kernel 6.1.62 to 6.1.63, and also
> from kernel 6.6.1 to 6.6.2; I can bisect if patch authors can't locate the
> relevant commit. In the most recent kernels mentioned, bluetooth won't
> function.
Then please do bisection; without it, nobody will look into this properly.
>
> Hardware: ASRock "X470 Taichi" motherboard - on board chipset.
> lsusb: ID 8087:0aa7 Intel Corp. Wireless-AC 3168 Bluetooth.
> dmesg: Bluetooth: hci0: Legacy ROM 2.x revision 5.0 build 25 week 20 2015
> Bluetooth: hci0: Intel Bluetooth firmware file:
> intel/ibt-hw-37.8.10-fw-22.50.19.14.f.bseq
> Bluetooth: hci0: Intel BT fw patch 0x43 completed & activated
> bluez: Version 5.70, bluez firmware version 1.2
> Linux kernel firmware: 20231117_7124ce3
>
> On a working kernel (such as 6.6.1), in addition to the dmesg output above,
> we have this:
> dmesg: Bluetooth: MGMT ver 1.22
> Bluetooth: hci0: Bad flag given (0x1) vs supported (0x0)
>
> On a failed kernel (such as 6.6.2), instead of the good output above, we
> have:
> dmesg: Bluetooth: hci0: Opcode 0x0c03 failed: -110
> Bluetooth: hci0: Opcode 0x0c03 failed: -110
> ...
> repeats several times as bluez attempts to communicate with hci0.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Since that email was sent, kernel firmware has been updated to
> 20231128_aae6052, and kernels 6.1.64 and 6.6.3 have been tried with no
> change observed.
>
You may also want to check current mainline (v6.7-rc3) to see if this
regression have already been fixed.
Anyway, thanks for the regression report. I'm adding it to regzbot
for tracking (as stable-specific regression for now):
#regzbot ^introduced: v6.6.1..v6.6.2
#regzbot link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218142
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Regression: Inoperative bluetooth, Intel chipset, mainline kernel 6.6.2+
2023-12-01 6:27 ` Regression: Inoperative bluetooth, Intel chipset, mainline kernel 6.6.2+ Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2023-12-01 8:19 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
2023-12-01 8:27 ` Paul Menzel
2023-12-03 12:17 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) @ 2023-12-01 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bagas Sanjaya, Linux Bluetooth, Linux Regressions,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Marcel Holtmann, Johan Hedberg, Luiz Augusto von Dentz, Zach
Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) wrote:
>> I have a regression going from mainline kernel 6.1.62 to 6.1.63, and also
>> from kernel 6.6.1 to 6.6.2; I can bisect if patch authors can't locate the
>> relevant commit. In the most recent kernels mentioned, bluetooth won't
>> function.
>
> Then please do bisection; without it, nobody will look into this properly.
As only a few people are reporting this, it must be pretty
hardware-specific (or perhaps Kconfig/firmware specific). I'll do a
bisect. A bit too late here in Boston (03:00), and kiddo's birthday
"later today", so will probably get to this on the weekend.
> You may also want to check current mainline (v6.7-rc3) to see if this
> regression have already been fixed.
Just tried 6.7.0-rc3, and it is also affected.
I hadn't git-pulled my linux-stable since May, so that gave me a good
chance to test the very latest. :-) And conveniently I'm now set for
the bisect.
Kris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Regression: Inoperative bluetooth, Intel chipset, mainline kernel 6.6.2+
2023-12-01 8:19 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
@ 2023-12-01 8:27 ` Paul Menzel
2023-12-03 12:17 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paul Menzel @ 2023-12-01 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya, linux-bluetooth, regressions, linux-kernel,
Marcel Holtmann, Johan Hedberg, Luiz Augusto von Dentz, Zach
Dear Kris,
Am 01.12.23 um 09:19 schrieb Kris Karas (Bug Reporting):
> Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) wrote:
>>> I have a regression going from mainline kernel 6.1.62 to 6.1.63, and
>>> also
>>> from kernel 6.6.1 to 6.6.2; I can bisect if patch authors can't
>>> locate the
>>> relevant commit. In the most recent kernels mentioned, bluetooth won't
>>> function.
>>
>> Then please do bisection; without it, nobody will look into this
>> properly.
>
> As only a few people are reporting this, it must be pretty
> hardware-specific (or perhaps Kconfig/firmware specific). I'll do a
> bisect. A bit too late here in Boston (03:00), and kiddo's birthday
> "later today", so will probably get to this on the weekend.
>
>> You may also want to check current mainline (v6.7-rc3) to see if this
>> regression have already been fixed.
>
> Just tried 6.7.0-rc3, and it is also affected.
>
> I hadn't git-pulled my linux-stable since May, so that gave me a good
> chance to test the very latest. :-) And conveniently I'm now set for
> the bisect.
Nice, that is often the fastest way to fix something.
To avoid the time rebooting the system, you could try to expose the
drive to a virtual machine [1].
Kind regards,
Paul
[1]:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/331ae35c-7d48-46fc-c4ae-1e60cb0f3378@molgen.mpg.de/
(The failure in the VM was due to another regression in the Linux
kernel, so the how-to actually worked for me.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Regression: Inoperative bluetooth, Intel chipset, mainline kernel 6.6.2+
2023-12-01 8:19 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
2023-12-01 8:27 ` Paul Menzel
@ 2023-12-03 12:17 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2023-12-03 18:46 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Oleksandr Natalenko @ 2023-12-03 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bagas Sanjaya, Linux Bluetooth, Linux Regressions,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
Cc: Marcel Holtmann, Johan Hedberg, Luiz Augusto von Dentz, Zach,
Paul Menzel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1312 bytes --]
Hello.
On pátek 1. prosince 2023 9:19:04 CET Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) wrote:
> >> I have a regression going from mainline kernel 6.1.62 to 6.1.63, and also
> >> from kernel 6.6.1 to 6.6.2; I can bisect if patch authors can't locate the
> >> relevant commit. In the most recent kernels mentioned, bluetooth won't
> >> function.
> >
> > Then please do bisection; without it, nobody will look into this properly.
>
> As only a few people are reporting this, it must be pretty
> hardware-specific (or perhaps Kconfig/firmware specific). I'll do a
> bisect. A bit too late here in Boston (03:00), and kiddo's birthday
> "later today", so will probably get to this on the weekend.
>
> > You may also want to check current mainline (v6.7-rc3) to see if this
> > regression have already been fixed.
>
> Just tried 6.7.0-rc3, and it is also affected.
Does passing `btusb.enable_autosuspend=N` via a kernel cmdline help? [1]
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5993222.lOV4Wx5bFT@natalenko.name/
> I hadn't git-pulled my linux-stable since May, so that gave me a good
> chance to test the very latest. :-) And conveniently I'm now set for
> the bisect.
>
> Kris
>
>
--
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Regression: Inoperative bluetooth, Intel chipset, mainline kernel 6.6.2+
2023-12-03 12:17 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
@ 2023-12-03 18:46 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) @ 2023-12-03 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleksandr Natalenko, Linux Bluetooth, Linux Regressions,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Basavaraj Natikar
Cc: Marcel Holtmann, Johan Hedberg, Luiz Augusto von Dentz, Zach,
Paul Menzel, Bagas Sanjaya, Greg KH
[ Replying to both Oleksandr and Basavaraj ]
Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> Does passing `btusb.enable_autosuspend=N` via a kernel cmdline help? [1]
Yes, this works around the problem. Should be a good short-term
solution for those folks who need to wait for distro kernels to catch
up. Thanks.
Basavaraj Natikar wrote:
>> Can we enable RPM on specific controllers for AMD xHC 1.1
>> instead to cover all AMD xHC 1.1?
>>
>> Please find below the proposed changes and let me know if it is OK?
>
> sorry its
> pdev->device == 0x43f7
Thanks, Basavaraj! Yes, this fixes the problem on my hardware (by
making application of PM more selective). Running successfully at the
moment using your (pdev->device amended) patch.
Kris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-03 18:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <ee109942-ef8e-45b9-8cb9-a98a787fe094@moonlit-rail.com>
2023-12-01 6:27 ` Regression: Inoperative bluetooth, Intel chipset, mainline kernel 6.6.2+ Bagas Sanjaya
2023-12-01 8:19 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
2023-12-01 8:27 ` Paul Menzel
2023-12-03 12:17 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2023-12-03 18:46 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox