* Re: Regression: Inoperative bluetooth, Intel chipset, mainline kernel 6.6.2+ [not found] <ee109942-ef8e-45b9-8cb9-a98a787fe094@moonlit-rail.com> @ 2023-12-01 6:27 ` Bagas Sanjaya 2023-12-01 8:19 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2023-12-01 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kris Karas (Bug Reporting), Linux Bluetooth, Linux Regressions, Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Marcel Holtmann, Johan Hedberg, Luiz Augusto von Dentz, Zach [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2499 bytes --] [also Cc: original Bugzilla reporter] On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 08:54:09PM -0500, Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) wrote: > Greetings - > > With mainline kernel 6.6.2+ (and 6.1.63, etc), bluetooth is inoperative > (reports "opcode 0x0c03 failed") on my motherboard's bluetooth adapter > (Intel chipset). Details below. > > I reported this in a comment tacked onto bugzilla #218142, but got no > response, so posting here as a possibly new issue. > > Details, original email: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > I have a regression going from mainline kernel 6.1.62 to 6.1.63, and also > from kernel 6.6.1 to 6.6.2; I can bisect if patch authors can't locate the > relevant commit. In the most recent kernels mentioned, bluetooth won't > function. Then please do bisection; without it, nobody will look into this properly. > > Hardware: ASRock "X470 Taichi" motherboard - on board chipset. > lsusb: ID 8087:0aa7 Intel Corp. Wireless-AC 3168 Bluetooth. > dmesg: Bluetooth: hci0: Legacy ROM 2.x revision 5.0 build 25 week 20 2015 > Bluetooth: hci0: Intel Bluetooth firmware file: > intel/ibt-hw-37.8.10-fw-22.50.19.14.f.bseq > Bluetooth: hci0: Intel BT fw patch 0x43 completed & activated > bluez: Version 5.70, bluez firmware version 1.2 > Linux kernel firmware: 20231117_7124ce3 > > On a working kernel (such as 6.6.1), in addition to the dmesg output above, > we have this: > dmesg: Bluetooth: MGMT ver 1.22 > Bluetooth: hci0: Bad flag given (0x1) vs supported (0x0) > > On a failed kernel (such as 6.6.2), instead of the good output above, we > have: > dmesg: Bluetooth: hci0: Opcode 0x0c03 failed: -110 > Bluetooth: hci0: Opcode 0x0c03 failed: -110 > ... > repeats several times as bluez attempts to communicate with hci0. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Since that email was sent, kernel firmware has been updated to > 20231128_aae6052, and kernels 6.1.64 and 6.6.3 have been tried with no > change observed. > You may also want to check current mainline (v6.7-rc3) to see if this regression have already been fixed. Anyway, thanks for the regression report. I'm adding it to regzbot for tracking (as stable-specific regression for now): #regzbot ^introduced: v6.6.1..v6.6.2 #regzbot link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218142 -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Regression: Inoperative bluetooth, Intel chipset, mainline kernel 6.6.2+ 2023-12-01 6:27 ` Regression: Inoperative bluetooth, Intel chipset, mainline kernel 6.6.2+ Bagas Sanjaya @ 2023-12-01 8:19 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) 2023-12-01 8:27 ` Paul Menzel 2023-12-03 12:17 ` Oleksandr Natalenko 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) @ 2023-12-01 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bagas Sanjaya, Linux Bluetooth, Linux Regressions, Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Marcel Holtmann, Johan Hedberg, Luiz Augusto von Dentz, Zach Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) wrote: >> I have a regression going from mainline kernel 6.1.62 to 6.1.63, and also >> from kernel 6.6.1 to 6.6.2; I can bisect if patch authors can't locate the >> relevant commit. In the most recent kernels mentioned, bluetooth won't >> function. > > Then please do bisection; without it, nobody will look into this properly. As only a few people are reporting this, it must be pretty hardware-specific (or perhaps Kconfig/firmware specific). I'll do a bisect. A bit too late here in Boston (03:00), and kiddo's birthday "later today", so will probably get to this on the weekend. > You may also want to check current mainline (v6.7-rc3) to see if this > regression have already been fixed. Just tried 6.7.0-rc3, and it is also affected. I hadn't git-pulled my linux-stable since May, so that gave me a good chance to test the very latest. :-) And conveniently I'm now set for the bisect. Kris ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Regression: Inoperative bluetooth, Intel chipset, mainline kernel 6.6.2+ 2023-12-01 8:19 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) @ 2023-12-01 8:27 ` Paul Menzel 2023-12-03 12:17 ` Oleksandr Natalenko 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Paul Menzel @ 2023-12-01 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) Cc: Bagas Sanjaya, linux-bluetooth, regressions, linux-kernel, Marcel Holtmann, Johan Hedberg, Luiz Augusto von Dentz, Zach Dear Kris, Am 01.12.23 um 09:19 schrieb Kris Karas (Bug Reporting): > Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >> Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) wrote: >>> I have a regression going from mainline kernel 6.1.62 to 6.1.63, and >>> also >>> from kernel 6.6.1 to 6.6.2; I can bisect if patch authors can't >>> locate the >>> relevant commit. In the most recent kernels mentioned, bluetooth won't >>> function. >> >> Then please do bisection; without it, nobody will look into this >> properly. > > As only a few people are reporting this, it must be pretty > hardware-specific (or perhaps Kconfig/firmware specific). I'll do a > bisect. A bit too late here in Boston (03:00), and kiddo's birthday > "later today", so will probably get to this on the weekend. > >> You may also want to check current mainline (v6.7-rc3) to see if this >> regression have already been fixed. > > Just tried 6.7.0-rc3, and it is also affected. > > I hadn't git-pulled my linux-stable since May, so that gave me a good > chance to test the very latest. :-) And conveniently I'm now set for > the bisect. Nice, that is often the fastest way to fix something. To avoid the time rebooting the system, you could try to expose the drive to a virtual machine [1]. Kind regards, Paul [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/331ae35c-7d48-46fc-c4ae-1e60cb0f3378@molgen.mpg.de/ (The failure in the VM was due to another regression in the Linux kernel, so the how-to actually worked for me.) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Regression: Inoperative bluetooth, Intel chipset, mainline kernel 6.6.2+ 2023-12-01 8:19 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) 2023-12-01 8:27 ` Paul Menzel @ 2023-12-03 12:17 ` Oleksandr Natalenko 2023-12-03 18:46 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Oleksandr Natalenko @ 2023-12-03 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bagas Sanjaya, Linux Bluetooth, Linux Regressions, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) Cc: Marcel Holtmann, Johan Hedberg, Luiz Augusto von Dentz, Zach, Paul Menzel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1312 bytes --] Hello. On pátek 1. prosince 2023 9:19:04 CET Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) wrote: > Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > > Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) wrote: > >> I have a regression going from mainline kernel 6.1.62 to 6.1.63, and also > >> from kernel 6.6.1 to 6.6.2; I can bisect if patch authors can't locate the > >> relevant commit. In the most recent kernels mentioned, bluetooth won't > >> function. > > > > Then please do bisection; without it, nobody will look into this properly. > > As only a few people are reporting this, it must be pretty > hardware-specific (or perhaps Kconfig/firmware specific). I'll do a > bisect. A bit too late here in Boston (03:00), and kiddo's birthday > "later today", so will probably get to this on the weekend. > > > You may also want to check current mainline (v6.7-rc3) to see if this > > regression have already been fixed. > > Just tried 6.7.0-rc3, and it is also affected. Does passing `btusb.enable_autosuspend=N` via a kernel cmdline help? [1] [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5993222.lOV4Wx5bFT@natalenko.name/ > I hadn't git-pulled my linux-stable since May, so that gave me a good > chance to test the very latest. :-) And conveniently I'm now set for > the bisect. > > Kris > > -- Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum) [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Regression: Inoperative bluetooth, Intel chipset, mainline kernel 6.6.2+ 2023-12-03 12:17 ` Oleksandr Natalenko @ 2023-12-03 18:46 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) @ 2023-12-03 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oleksandr Natalenko, Linux Bluetooth, Linux Regressions, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Basavaraj Natikar Cc: Marcel Holtmann, Johan Hedberg, Luiz Augusto von Dentz, Zach, Paul Menzel, Bagas Sanjaya, Greg KH [ Replying to both Oleksandr and Basavaraj ] Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: > Does passing `btusb.enable_autosuspend=N` via a kernel cmdline help? [1] Yes, this works around the problem. Should be a good short-term solution for those folks who need to wait for distro kernels to catch up. Thanks. Basavaraj Natikar wrote: >> Can we enable RPM on specific controllers for AMD xHC 1.1 >> instead to cover all AMD xHC 1.1? >> >> Please find below the proposed changes and let me know if it is OK? > > sorry its > pdev->device == 0x43f7 Thanks, Basavaraj! Yes, this fixes the problem on my hardware (by making application of PM more selective). Running successfully at the moment using your (pdev->device amended) patch. Kris ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-03 18:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <ee109942-ef8e-45b9-8cb9-a98a787fe094@moonlit-rail.com>
2023-12-01 6:27 ` Regression: Inoperative bluetooth, Intel chipset, mainline kernel 6.6.2+ Bagas Sanjaya
2023-12-01 8:19 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
2023-12-01 8:27 ` Paul Menzel
2023-12-03 12:17 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2023-12-03 18:46 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox