From: nerdopolis <bluescreen_avenger@verizon.net>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
pmladek@suse.com, john.ogness@linutronix.de,
senozhatsky@chromium.org, tglx@linutronix.de, tony@atomide.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: VT-less kernels, and /dev/console on x86
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:50:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2719346.q0ZmV6gNhb@nerdopolis2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240819110935.2a7c6241@gandalf.local.home>
On Monday, August 19, 2024 11:09:35 AM EDT Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 10:30:22 -0400
> nerdopolis <bluescreen_avenger@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, August 18, 2024 8:33:25 AM EDT nerdopolis wrote:
> > > On Sunday, August 18, 2024 1:12:14 AM EDT Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 08:09:20PM -0400, nerdopolis wrote:
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > I originally brought this up on linux-serial, but I think it makes more sense
> > > > > that it's part of how printk console device selection works. Without VTs, while
> > > > > most software is able to handle the situation, some userspace programs expect
> > > > > /dev/console to still be responsive. Namely systemd. It calls isatty() against
> > > > > /dev/console, and since /dev/console on VT-less systems currently defaults to
> > > > > /dev/ttyS0, and when /dev/ttyS0 is disconnected, the ioctl's fail, and it
> > > > > refuses to write log messages to it.
> > > > >
> > > > > There doesn't seem to be a mailing list for printk, so I had to use
> > > > > get_maintainer.pl. Hopefully this is correct
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > After some grepping and guessing and testing, and playing around Something like
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/Kconfig b/drivers/tty/Kconfig
> > > > > index a45d423ad10f..f94a4632aab0 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/tty/Kconfig
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/tty/Kconfig
> > > > > @@ -384,9 +384,12 @@ config NULL_TTY
> > > > >
> > > > > In order to use this driver, you should redirect the console to this
> > > > > TTY, or boot the kernel with console=ttynull.
> > > > > -
> > > > > If unsure, say N.
> > > > >
> > > > > +config NULL_TTY_CONSOLE
> > > > > + bool "Supports /dev/ttynull as a console automatically"
> > > > > + depends on NULL_TTY && !VT_CONSOLE
> > > > > +
> > > > > config VCC
> > > > > tristate "Sun Virtual Console Concentrator"
> > > > > depends on SUN_LDOMS
> > > > > diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > > > > index dddb15f48d59..c1554a789de8 100644
> > > > > --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > > > > +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > > > > @@ -3712,6 +3712,11 @@ void __init console_init(void)
> > > > > initcall_t call;
> > > > > initcall_entry_t *ce;
> > > > >
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NULL_TTY_CONSOLE
> > > > > + if (!strstr(boot_command_line, "console="))
> > > > > + add_preferred_console("ttynull", 0, NULL);
> > > > > +#endif
> > > > > +
> > > > > /* Setup the default TTY line discipline. */
> > > > > n_tty_init();
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > seems to work, it conflicts with CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE since it is effectively
> > > > > redundant, it is optional, so that it doesn't cause any changes to
> > > > > configurations, that historically had CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE turned off in the past,
> > > > > and for bootloader configs, it won't change any behavior if the kernel command
> > > > > line has a console device specified
> > > >
> > > > What is wrong with just setting the kernel command line for this
> > > > instead?
> > > >
> > > When they eventually start shipping kernels without VTs, they will then have to
> > > include a script in their upgrade process that runs
> > >
> > > sed -i "s/GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=\"/GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=\"nomodeset /g" /etc/default/grub
> > Ugh, I meant
> > sed -i "s/GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=\"/GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=\"console=ttynull /g" /etc/default/grub
> > sorry
>
> If you can modify the kernel .config for this, can you just update:
>
> CONFIG_CMDLINE_BOOL=y
> CONFIG_CMDLINE="console=ttynull"
>
> ?
>
That could work, I think. I'll have to see how that works when a different
console= is specified on the command line from the bootloader though, I am
thinking that if console=ttyS0 is then manually specified by a user, there will
be two devices in /proc/consoles (ttyS0 on top of ttynull), but I admit I don't
know if there are actual ramifications of that, or not...
I am not sure if real distributions would want this to be the answer I guess I
will have to see if any others are using CONFIG_CMDLINE_BOOL/CONFIG_CMDLINE,
although this gives me an idea..
Would something like this below be more acceptable? I didn't test it yet, but
just the theory. I am thinking that this could have more use to allow a
preferred to be set...
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index dddb15f48d59..c1554a789de8 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -3712,6 +3712,11 @@ void __init console_init(void)
initcall_t call;
initcall_entry_t *ce;
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEFAULT_CONSOLE_HINT_BOOL
+ if (!strstr(boot_command_line, "console="))
+ add_preferred_console(CONFIG_DEFAULT_CONSOLE_HINT, 0, NULL);
+#endif
+
/* Setup the default TTY line discipline. */
n_tty_init();
> There's also bootconfig, that allows you to append command lines to the
> kernel image. See CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG and Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst
>
> -- Steve
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-19 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <2669238.7s5MMGUR32.ref@nerdopolis2>
2024-08-18 0:09 ` VT-less kernels, and /dev/console on x86 nerdopolis
2024-08-18 1:07 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2024-08-18 2:31 ` nerdopolis
2024-08-18 5:12 ` Greg KH
2024-08-18 14:33 ` nerdopolis
2024-08-18 5:12 ` Greg KH
2024-08-18 12:33 ` nerdopolis
2024-08-18 14:30 ` nerdopolis
2024-08-19 15:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-08-19 15:50 ` nerdopolis [this message]
2024-08-20 13:29 ` Petr Mladek
2024-08-21 17:12 ` nerdopolis
2024-08-22 10:05 ` Petr Mladek
2024-08-22 12:49 ` nerdopolis
2024-08-27 12:53 ` nerdopolis
2024-08-27 13:46 ` Willy Tarreau
2024-09-12 16:48 ` nerdopolis
2024-09-12 17:25 ` Willy Tarreau
2024-09-12 18:46 ` nerdopolis
2024-09-13 2:22 ` nerdopolis
2024-09-17 12:54 ` nerdopolis
2024-10-15 13:26 ` nerdopolis
2024-09-12 12:29 ` nerdopolis
2024-09-12 13:27 ` Petr Mladek
2024-10-09 9:24 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2024-10-09 17:49 ` nerdopolis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2719346.q0ZmV6gNhb@nerdopolis2 \
--to=bluescreen_avenger@verizon.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox