From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:46:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:45:52 -0500 Received: from ppp0.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.3]:26896 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:45:36 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 From: Keith Owens To: Neale Banks cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.2.18: apm initialised before dmi_scan? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 31 Jan 2001 22:54:22 +1100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 22:45:29 +1100 Message-ID: <2743.980941529@ocs3.ocs-net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 22:54:22 +1100 (EST), Neale Banks wrote: >If this is a correct and justifiable fix for 2.2 then in 2.4 should >dmi_scan.o be included in export-objs? Or is there a "better" way of >doing this? It should already be correct in 2.4. In 2.2 the OX_OBJS list is independent from the O_OBJS list and OX_OBJS is linked first, causing strange out of order problems. In 2.4 export-objs is a subset of the object list and export-objs does not impose any link ordering. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/