From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 30 May 2002 06:25:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 30 May 2002 06:25:53 -0400 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:55795 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 30 May 2002 06:25:52 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <20020530064048.GJ19308@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> To: Jan Hubicka Cc: Pavel Machek , Dave Jones , Ruth Ivimey-Cook , Luigi Genoni , "J.A. Magallon" , Luca Barbieri , Marcelo Tosatti , Linux-Kernel ML Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2.4] [2.5] [i386] Add support for GCC 3.1 -march=pentium{-mmx,3,4} Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 11:25:14 +0100 Message-ID: <27631.1022754314@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org jh@suse.cz said: > I don't do that at the moment. I am thinking about teaching it to > use SSE moves for moving/clearing 64bit and larger values in memory. > (ie for inlining constantly sized string operations) Please ensure that we get -mno-implicit-fp and/or -mno-implicit-sse options to GCC _long_ before there's any chance of actually _needing_ to use them to get a correct kernel compile. -- dwmw2