linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
To: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>, <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <tytso@mit.edu>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>, <jack@suse.cz>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
	<julia.lawall@inria.fr>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
	<libaokun@huaweicloud.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] ext4: better scalability for ext4 block allocation
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 09:11:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <277b45e3-173d-4cf4-b044-7c25cd42e41b@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250714130327.1830534-1-libaokun1@huawei.com>

On 2025/7/14 21:03, Baokun Li wrote:
> Changes since v2:
>  * Collect RVB from Jan Kara. (Thanks for your review!)
>  * Add patch 2.
>  * Patch 4: Switching to READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE (great for single-process)
>         over smp_load_acquire/smp_store_release (only slight multi-process
>         gain). (Suggested by Jan Kara)
>  * Patch 5: The number of global goals is now set to the lesser of the CPU
>         count or one-fourth of the group count. This prevents setting too
>         many goals for small filesystems, which lead to file dispersion.
>         (Suggested by Jan Kara)
>  * Patch 5: Directly use kfree() to release s_mb_last_groups instead of
>         kvfree(). (Suggested by Julia Lawall)
>  * Patch 11: Even without mb_optimize_scan enabled, we now always attempt
>         to remove the group from the old order list.(Suggested by Jan Kara)
>  * Patch 14-16: Added comments for clarity, refined logic, and removed
>         obsolete variables.
>  * Update performance test results and indicate raw disk write bandwidth. 
> 
> Thanks to Honza for your suggestions!

This is a nice improvement! Overall, the series looks good to me!

Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>

> 
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250623073304.3275702-1-libaokun1@huawei.com
> 
> Changes since v1:
>  * Patch 1: Prioritize checking if a group is busy to avoid unnecessary
>        checks and buddy loading. (Thanks to Ojaswin for the suggestion!)
>  * Patch 4: Using multiple global goals instead of moving the goal to the
>        inode level. (Thanks to Honza for the suggestion!)
>  * Collect RVB from Jan Kara and Ojaswin Mujoo.(Thanks for your review!)
>  * Add patch 2,3,7-16.
>  * Due to the change of test server, the relevant test data was refreshed.
> 
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250523085821.1329392-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
> 
> Since servers have more and more CPUs, and we're running more containers
> on them, we've been using will-it-scale to test how well ext4 scales. The
> fallocate2 test (append 8KB to 1MB, truncate to 0, repeat) run concurrently
> on 64 containers revealed significant contention in block allocation/free,
> leading to much lower average fallocate OPS compared to a single
> container (see below).
> 
>    1   |    2   |    4   |    8   |   16   |   32   |   64
> -------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|-------
> 295287 | 70665  | 33865  | 19387  | 10104  |  5588  |  3588
> 
> Under this test scenario, the primary operations are block allocation
> (fallocate) and block deallocation (truncate). The main bottlenecks for
> these operations are the group lock and s_md_lock. Therefore, this patch
> series primarily focuses on optimizing the code related to these two locks.
> 
> The following is a brief overview of the patches, see the patches for
> more details.
> 
> Patch 1: Add ext4_try_lock_group() to skip busy groups to take advantage
> of the large number of ext4 groups.
> 
> Patch 2: Separates stream goal hits from s_bal_goals in preparation for
> cleanup of s_mb_last_start.
> 
> Patches 3-5: Split stream allocation's global goal into multiple goals and
> remove the unnecessary and expensive s_md_lock.
> 
> Patches 6-7: minor cleanups
> 
> Patches 8: Converted s_mb_free_pending to atomic_t and used memory barriers
> for consistency, instead of relying on the expensive s_md_lock.
> 
> Patches 9: When inserting free extents, we now attempt to merge them with
> already inserted extents first, to reduce s_md_lock contention.
> 
> Patches 10: Updates bb_avg_fragment_size_order to -1 when a group is out of
> free blocks, eliminating efficiency-impacting "zombie groups."
> 
> Patches 11: Fix potential largest free orders lists corruption when the
> mb_optimize_scan mount option is switched on or off.
> 
> Patches 12-17: Convert mb_optimize_scan's existing unordered list traversal
> to ordered xarrays, thereby reducing contention between block allocation
> and freeing, similar to linear traversal.
> 
> "kvm-xfstests -c ext4/all -g auto" has been executed with no new failures.
> 
> Here are some performance test data for your reference:
> 
> Test: Running will-it-scale/fallocate2 on CPU-bound containers.
> Observation: Average fallocate operations per container per second.
> 
> |CPU: Kunpeng 920   |          P80           |            P1           |
> |Memory: 512GB      |------------------------|-------------------------|
> |960GB SSD (0.5GB/s)| base  |    patched     | base   |    patched     |
> |-------------------|-------|----------------|--------|----------------|
> |mb_optimize_scan=0 | 2667  | 20049 (+651%)  | 314065 | 316724 (+0.8%) |
> |mb_optimize_scan=1 | 2643  | 19342 (+631%)  | 316344 | 328324 (+3.7%) |
> 
> |CPU: AMD 9654 * 2  |          P96           |             P1          |
> |Memory: 1536GB     |------------------------|-------------------------|
> |960GB SSD (1GB/s)  | base  |    patched     | base   |    patched     |
> |-------------------|-------|----------------|--------|----------------|
> |mb_optimize_scan=0 | 3450  | 52125 (+1410%) | 205851 | 215136 (+4.5%) |
> |mb_optimize_scan=1 | 3209  | 50331 (+1468%) | 207373 | 209431 (+0.9%) |
> 
> Tests also evaluated this patch set's impact on fragmentation: a minor
> increase in free space fragmentation for multi-process workloads, but a
> significant decrease in file fragmentation:
> 
> Test Script:
> ```shell
> #!/bin/bash
> 
> dir="/tmp/test"
> disk="/dev/sda"
> 
> mkdir -p $dir
> 
> for scan in 0 1 ; do
>     mkfs.ext4 -F -E lazy_itable_init=0,lazy_journal_init=0 \
>               -O orphan_file $disk 200G
>     mount -o mb_optimize_scan=$scan $disk $dir
> 
>     fio -directory=$dir -direct=1 -iodepth 128 -thread -ioengine=falloc \
>         -rw=write -bs=4k -fallocate=none -numjobs=64 -file_append=1 \
>         -size=1G -group_reporting -name=job1 -cpus_allowed_policy=split
> 
>     e2freefrag $disk
>     e4defrag -c $dir # Without the patch, this could take 5-6 hours.
>     filefrag ${dir}/job* | awk '{print $2}' | \
>                            awk '{sum+=$1} END {print sum/NR}'
>     umount $dir
> done
> ```
> 
> Test results:
> -------------------------------------------------------------|
>                          |       base      |      patched    |
> -------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
> mb_optimize_scan         | linear |opt_scan| linear |opt_scan|
> -------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
> bw(MiB/s)                | 217    | 217    | 5718   | 5626   |
> -------------------------|-----------------------------------|
> Avg. free extent size(KB)| 1943732| 1943732| 1316212| 1171208|
> Num. free extent         | 71     | 71     | 105    | 118    |
> -------------------------------------------------------------|
> Avg. extents per file    | 261967 | 261973 | 588    | 570    |
> Avg. size per extent(KB) | 4      | 4      | 1780   | 1837   |
> Fragmentation score      | 100    | 100    | 2      | 2      |
> -------------------------------------------------------------|
> 
> Comments and questions are, as always, welcome.
> 
> Thanks,
> Baokun
> 
> Baokun Li (17):
>   ext4: add ext4_try_lock_group() to skip busy groups
>   ext4: separate stream goal hits from s_bal_goals for better tracking
>   ext4: remove unnecessary s_mb_last_start
>   ext4: remove unnecessary s_md_lock on update s_mb_last_group
>   ext4: utilize multiple global goals to reduce contention
>   ext4: get rid of some obsolete EXT4_MB_HINT flags
>   ext4: fix typo in CR_GOAL_LEN_SLOW comment
>   ext4: convert sbi->s_mb_free_pending to atomic_t
>   ext4: merge freed extent with existing extents before insertion
>   ext4: fix zombie groups in average fragment size lists
>   ext4: fix largest free orders lists corruption on mb_optimize_scan
>     switch
>   ext4: factor out __ext4_mb_scan_group()
>   ext4: factor out ext4_mb_might_prefetch()
>   ext4: factor out ext4_mb_scan_group()
>   ext4: convert free groups order lists to xarrays
>   ext4: refactor choose group to scan group
>   ext4: implement linear-like traversal across order xarrays
> 
>  fs/ext4/balloc.c            |   2 +-
>  fs/ext4/ext4.h              |  61 +--
>  fs/ext4/mballoc.c           | 895 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  fs/ext4/mballoc.h           |   9 +-
>  include/trace/events/ext4.h |   3 -
>  5 files changed, 534 insertions(+), 436 deletions(-)
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-15  1:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-14 13:03 [PATCH v3 00/17] ext4: better scalability for ext4 block allocation Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] ext4: add ext4_try_lock_group() to skip busy groups Baokun Li
2025-07-17 10:09   ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-19  0:37     ` Baokun Li
2025-07-17 22:28   ` Andi Kleen
2025-07-18  3:09     ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-07-19  0:29     ` Baokun Li
2025-07-22 20:59       ` Andi Kleen
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] ext4: separate stream goal hits from s_bal_goals for better tracking Baokun Li
2025-07-17 10:29   ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-19  1:37     ` Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] ext4: remove unnecessary s_mb_last_start Baokun Li
2025-07-17 10:31   ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] ext4: remove unnecessary s_md_lock on update s_mb_last_group Baokun Li
2025-07-17 13:36   ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-19  1:54     ` Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] ext4: utilize multiple global goals to reduce contention Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] ext4: get rid of some obsolete EXT4_MB_HINT flags Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] ext4: fix typo in CR_GOAL_LEN_SLOW comment Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] ext4: convert sbi->s_mb_free_pending to atomic_t Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] ext4: merge freed extent with existing extents before insertion Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] ext4: fix zombie groups in average fragment size lists Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] ext4: fix largest free orders lists corruption on mb_optimize_scan switch Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] ext4: factor out __ext4_mb_scan_group() Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] ext4: factor out ext4_mb_might_prefetch() Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] ext4: factor out ext4_mb_scan_group() Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] ext4: convert free groups order lists to xarrays Baokun Li
2025-07-21 11:07   ` Jan Kara
2025-07-21 12:33     ` Baokun Li
2025-07-21 13:45       ` Baokun Li
2025-07-21 18:01         ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-07-22  5:58           ` Baokun Li
2025-07-24  3:55   ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-24  4:54     ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-07-24  5:20       ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-24 11:14       ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-24 14:30         ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-24 14:54         ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-07-25  2:28           ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-26  0:50             ` Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] ext4: refactor choose group to scan group Baokun Li
2025-07-14 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] ext4: implement linear-like traversal across order xarrays Baokun Li
2025-07-15  1:11 ` Zhang Yi [this message]
2025-07-19 21:45 ` [PATCH v3 00/17] ext4: better scalability for ext4 block allocation Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=277b45e3-173d-4cf4-b044-7c25cd42e41b@huawei.com \
    --to=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=libaokun@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).