From: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Cc: Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com>,
boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, marek.vasut@gmail.com,
richard@nod.at, dwmw2@infradead.org, cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr,
max.oss.09@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: nand: gpmi: add support for specific ECC strength
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 22:36:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27a3becf329c1aa8ce8b3cc99f5a4de7@agner.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180214200537.2c043a21@bbrezillon>
On 14.02.2018 20:05, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:28:36 +0000
> Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com> wrote:
>
>> On 02/06/2018 11:40 AM, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> > Add support for specified ECC strength/size using device tree
>> > properties nand-ecc-strength/nand-ecc-step-size.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
>> > ---
>> > .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmi-nand.txt | 5 ++++
>> > drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c | 29 ++++++++++++++--------
>> > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmi-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmi-nand.txt
>> > index eb2d9919d063..ea6e9b735160 100644
>> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmi-nand.txt
>> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmi-nand.txt
>> > @@ -46,6 +46,11 @@ Optional properties:
>> > partitions written from Linux with this feature
>> > turned on may not be accessible by the BootROM
>> > code.
>> > + - nand-ecc-strength: integer representing the number of bits to correct
>> > + per ECC step. Needs to be a multiple of 2.
>> > + - nand-ecc-step-size: integer representing the number of data bytes
>> > + that are covered by a single ECC step. The driver
>> > + supports 512 and 1024.
>> >
>> > The device tree may optionally contain sub-nodes describing partitions of the
>> > address space. See partition.txt for more detail.
>> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
>> > index 50f8d4a1b983..8cb378358e11 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
>> > @@ -198,17 +198,15 @@ static inline bool gpmi_check_ecc(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
>> > *
>> > * We may have available oob space in this case.
>> > */
>> > -static int set_geometry_by_ecc_info(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
>> > +static int set_geometry_by_ecc_info(struct gpmi_nand_data *this,
>> > + unsigned int ecc_strength, unsigned int ecc_step)
>> > {
>> > struct bch_geometry *geo = &this->bch_geometry;
>> > struct nand_chip *chip = &this->nand;
>> > struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
>> > unsigned int block_mark_bit_offset;
>> >
>> > - if (!(chip->ecc_strength_ds > 0 && chip->ecc_step_ds > 0))
>> > - return -EINVAL;
>> > -
>> > - switch (chip->ecc_step_ds) {
>> > + switch (ecc_step) {
>> > case SZ_512:
>> > geo->gf_len = 13;
>> > break;
>> > @@ -221,8 +219,8 @@ static int set_geometry_by_ecc_info(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
>> > chip->ecc_strength_ds, chip->ecc_step_ds);
>> > return -EINVAL;
>> > }
>> > - geo->ecc_chunk_size = chip->ecc_step_ds;
>> > - geo->ecc_strength = round_up(chip->ecc_strength_ds, 2);
>> > + geo->ecc_chunk_size = ecc_step;
>> > + geo->ecc_strength = round_up(ecc_strength, 2);
>> > if (!gpmi_check_ecc(this))
>> > return -EINVAL;
>> >
>> > @@ -230,7 +228,7 @@ static int set_geometry_by_ecc_info(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
>> > if (geo->ecc_chunk_size < mtd->oobsize) {
>> > dev_err(this->dev,
>> > "unsupported nand chip. ecc size: %d, oob size : %d\n",
>> > - chip->ecc_step_ds, mtd->oobsize);
>> > + ecc_step, mtd->oobsize);
>> > return -EINVAL;
>> > }
>> >
>> > @@ -423,9 +421,20 @@ static int legacy_set_geometry(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
>> >
>> > int common_nfc_set_geometry(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
>> > {
>> > + struct nand_chip *chip = &this->nand;
>> > +
>> > + if (chip->ecc.strength > 0 && chip->ecc.size > 0)
>> > + return set_geometry_by_ecc_info(this, chip->ecc.strength,
>> > + chip->ecc.size);
>> > +
>>
>> I was wondering how to keep, let's say u-boot, and kernel ecc setting
>> aligned, if users can specify the strength and step_ds in DT? Did u-boot
>> enable to get these parameters from DT?
>
> Both u-boot and Linux have to support using strength/step information
> passed through the DT before you can start patching dts files. Anyway,
> users will have to change their DT (add the nand-ecc-strength/step-size
> properties) to use this feature, so they should quickly notice that
> something is going wrong and update their bootloader or drop those
> nand-ecc-xxx props.
>
Yes, the MTD stack has support for those properties also in U-Boot.
But currently the GPMI NAND driver (mxs_nand) in U-Boot has no DT
support.
But I do have a preliminary patch set for this. Will send it out soon.
--
Stefan
>> > if ((of_property_read_bool(this->dev->of_node, "fsl,use-minimum-ecc"))
>> > - || legacy_set_geometry(this))
>> > - return set_geometry_by_ecc_info(this);
>> > + || legacy_set_geometry(this)) {
>> > + if (!(chip->ecc_strength_ds > 0 && chip->ecc_step_ds > 0))
>> > + return -EINVAL;
>> > +
>> > + return set_geometry_by_ecc_info(this, chip->ecc_strength_ds,
>> > + chip->ecc_step_ds);
>> > + }
>> >
>> > return 0;
>> > }
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-14 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-06 17:40 [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: gpmi-nand: specify fsl,use-minimum-ecc behavior Stefan Agner
2018-02-06 17:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] mtd: nand: gpmi: add support for specific ECC strength Stefan Agner
2018-02-12 10:31 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-12 10:33 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-14 16:28 ` Han Xu
2018-02-14 19:05 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-02-14 21:36 ` Stefan Agner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27a3becf329c1aa8ce8b3cc99f5a4de7@agner.ch \
--to=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=han.xu@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=max.oss.09@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox