From: "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
"vincent.guittot@linaro.org" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"juri.lelli@redhat.com" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"dietmar.eggemann@arm.com" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"bsegall@google.com" <bsegall@google.com>,
"mgorman@suse.de" <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxarm@openeuler.org" <linuxarm@openeuler.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] sched/topology: remove redundant cpumask_and in init_overlap_sched_group
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 20:25:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27e60cb105e040deb16af774399db15e@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jhjeegt7rdg.mognet@arm.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Valentin Schneider [mailto:valentin.schneider@arm.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 6, 2021 12:49 AM
> To: Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>;
> vincent.guittot@linaro.org; mingo@redhat.com; peterz@infradead.org;
> juri.lelli@redhat.com; dietmar.eggemann@arm.com; rostedt@goodmis.org;
> bsegall@google.com; mgorman@suse.de
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linuxarm@openeuler.org; Song Bao Hua (Barry
> Song) <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/topology: remove redundant cpumask_and in
> init_overlap_sched_group
>
> On 05/03/21 11:29, Barry Song wrote:
> > mask is built in build_balance_mask() by for_each_cpu(i, sg_span), so
> > it must be a subset of sched_group_span(sg).
>
> So we should indeed have
>
> cpumask_subset(sched_group_span(sg), mask)
>
> but that doesn't imply
>
> cpumask_first(sched_group_span(sg)) == cpumask_first(mask)
>
> does it? I'm thinking if in your topology of N CPUs, CPUs 0 and N-1 are the
> furthest away, you will most likely hit
It is true:
cpumask_first(sched_group_span(sg)) != cpumask_first(mask)
but
cpumask_first_and(sched_group_span(sg), mask) = cpumask_first(mask)
since mask is always subset of sched_group_span(sg).
/**
* cpumask_first_and - return the first cpu from *srcp1 & *srcp2
* @src1p: the first input
* @src2p: the second input
*
* Returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus set in both. See also cpumask_next_and().
*/
*srcp2 is subset of *srcp1, so *srcp1 & *srcp2 = *srcp2
>
> !cpumask_equal(sg_pan, sched_domain_span(sibling->child))
> ^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> CPUN-1 CPU0
>
> which should be the case on your Kunpeng920 system.
>
> > Though cpumask_first_and
> > doesn't lead to a wrong result of balance cpu, it is pointless to do
> > cpumask_and again.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/topology.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > index 12f8058..45f3db2 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > @@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ static void init_overlap_sched_group(struct sched_domain
> *sd,
> > int cpu;
> >
> > build_balance_mask(sd, sg, mask);
> > - cpu = cpumask_first_and(sched_group_span(sg), mask);
> > + cpu = cpumask_first(mask);
> >
> > sg->sgc = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sgc, cpu);
> > if (atomic_inc_return(&sg->sgc->ref) == 1)
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
Thanks
Barry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-05 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-04 22:29 [PATCH] sched/topology: remove redundant cpumask_and in init_overlap_sched_group Barry Song
2021-03-05 11:48 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-03-05 20:25 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) [this message]
2021-03-07 18:19 ` Valentin Schneider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27e60cb105e040deb16af774399db15e@hisilicon.com \
--to=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox