public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: quietly ignore deprecated mount options
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 13:27:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2800646.mvXUDI8C0e@natalenko.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251013233229.GR6188@frogsfrogsfrogs>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5795 bytes --]

Hello.

On úterý 14. října 2025 1:32:29, středoevropský letní čas Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> 
> Apparently we can never deprecate mount options in this project, because
> it will invariably turn out that some foolish userspace depends on some
> behavior and break.  From Oleksandr Natalenko:
> 
> > In v6.18, the attr2 XFS mount option is removed. This may silently
> > break system boot if the attr2 option is still present in /etc/fstab
> > for rootfs.
> >
> > Consider Arch Linux that is being set up from scratch with / being
> > formatted as XFS. The genfstab command that is used to generate
> > /etc/fstab produces something like this by default:
> >
> > /dev/sda2 on / type xfs (rw,relatime,attr2,discard,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=32k,noquota)
> >
> > Once the system is set up and rebooted, there's no deprecation warning
> > seen in the kernel log:
> >
> > # cat /proc/cmdline
> > root=UUID=77b42de2-397e-47ee-a1ef-4dfd430e47e9 rootflags=discard rd.luks.options=discard quiet
> >
> > # dmesg | grep -i xfs
> > [    2.409818] SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes, realtime, scrub, repair, quota, no debug enabled
> > [    2.415341] XFS (sda2): Mounting V5 Filesystem 77b42de2-397e-47ee-a1ef-4dfd430e47e9
> > [    2.442546] XFS (sda2): Ending clean mount
> >
> > Although as per the deprecation intention, it should be there.
> >
> > Vlastimil (in Cc) suggests this is because xfs_fs_warn_deprecated()
> > doesn't produce any warning by design if the XFS FS is set to be
> > rootfs and gets remounted read-write during boot. This imposes two
> > problems:
> >
> > 1) a user doesn't see the deprecation warning; and
> > 2) with v6.18 kernel, the read-write remount fails because of unknown
> >    attr2 option rendering system unusable:
> >
> > systemd[1]: Switching root.
> > systemd-remount-fs[225]: /usr/bin/mount for / exited with exit status 32.
> >
> > # mount -o rw /
> > mount: /: fsconfig() failed: xfs: Unknown parameter 'attr2'.
> >
> > Thorsten (in Cc) suggested reporting this as a user-visible regression.
> >
> > From my PoV, although the deprecation is in place for 5 years already,
> > it may not be visible enough as the warning is not emitted for rootfs.
> > Considering the amount of systems set up with XFS on /, this may
> > impose a mass problem for users.
> >
> > Vlastimil suggested making attr2 option a complete noop instead of
> > removing it.
> 
> IOWs, the initrd mounts the root fs with (I assume) no mount options,
> and mount -a remounts with whatever options are in fstab.  However,
> XFS doesn't complain about deprecated mount options during a remount, so
> technically speaking we were not warning all users in all combinations
> that they were heading for a cliff.
> 
> Gotcha!!
> 
> Now, how did 'attr2' get slurped up on so many systems?  The old code
> would put that in /proc/mounts if the filesystem happened to be in attr2
> mode, even if user hadn't mounted with any such option.  IOWs, this is
> because someone thought it would be a good idea to advertise system
> state via /proc/mounts.
> 
> The easy way to fix this is to reintroduce the four mount options but
> map them to a no-op option that ignores them, and hope that nobody's
> depending on attr2 to appear in /proc/mounts.  (Hint: use the fsgeometry
> ioctl).
> 
> Lessons learned:
> 
>  1. Don't expose system state via /proc/mounts; the only strings that
>     ought to be there are options *explicitly* provided by the user.
>  2. Never tidy, it's not worth the stress and irritation.
> 
> Reported-by: oleksandr@natalenko.name
> Reported-by: vbabka@suse.cz
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.18-rc1
> Fixes: b9a176e54162f8 ("xfs: remove deprecated mount options")
> Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c |   13 +++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index e85a156dc17d16..e1df41991fccc3 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static const struct constant_table dax_param_enums[] = {
>   * Table driven mount option parser.
>   */
>  enum {
> -	Opt_logbufs, Opt_logbsize, Opt_logdev, Opt_rtdev,
> +	Opt_quietlyignore, Opt_logbufs, Opt_logbsize, Opt_logdev, Opt_rtdev,
>  	Opt_wsync, Opt_noalign, Opt_swalloc, Opt_sunit, Opt_swidth, Opt_nouuid,
>  	Opt_grpid, Opt_nogrpid, Opt_bsdgroups, Opt_sysvgroups,
>  	Opt_allocsize, Opt_norecovery, Opt_inode64, Opt_inode32,
> @@ -115,6 +115,14 @@ enum {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct fs_parameter_spec xfs_fs_parameters[] = {
> +	/*
> +	 * These mount options were advertised in /proc/mounts even if the
> +	 * filesystem had not been mounted with that option.  Quietly ignore
> +	 * them to avoid breaking scripts that captured /proc/mounts.
> +	 */
> +	fsparam_flag("attr",		Opt_quietlyignore),

Should have been "attr2" here I suppose.

Thanks.

> +	fsparam_flag("noattr2",		Opt_quietlyignore),
> +
>  	fsparam_u32("logbufs",		Opt_logbufs),
>  	fsparam_string("logbsize",	Opt_logbsize),
>  	fsparam_string("logdev",	Opt_logdev),
> @@ -1408,6 +1416,8 @@ xfs_fs_parse_param(
>  		return opt;
>  
>  	switch (opt) {
> +	case Opt_quietlyignore:
> +		return 0;
>  	case Opt_logbufs:
>  		parsing_mp->m_logbufs = result.uint_32;
>  		return 0;
> @@ -1528,7 +1538,6 @@ xfs_fs_parse_param(
>  		xfs_mount_set_dax_mode(parsing_mp, result.uint_32);
>  		return 0;
>  #endif
> -	/* Following mount options will be removed in September 2025 */
>  	case Opt_max_open_zones:
>  		parsing_mp->m_max_open_zones = result.uint_32;
>  		return 0;
> 

-- 
Oleksandr Natalenko, MSE

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-14 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-13 23:32 [PATCH 1/2] xfs: quietly ignore deprecated mount options Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-13 23:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: always warn about " Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-14  4:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-14 20:35     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-14  4:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: quietly ignore " Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-14 11:27 ` Oleksandr Natalenko [this message]
2025-10-14 18:22   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2800646.mvXUDI8C0e@natalenko.name \
    --to=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=preichl@redhat.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox