From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756343Ab1LGO3x (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:29:53 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1026 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755803Ab1LGO3v (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:29:51 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <4EDCABBD.9020401@intel.com> <20111129234258.13625.21153.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <776.1323085419@redhat.com> To: James Morris Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, "H. Peter Anvin" , keyrings@linux-nfs.org, alan.cox@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com, Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [Keyrings] [RFC][PATCH 00/16] Crypto keys and module signing [ver #2] Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:29:32 +0000 Message-ID: <28095.1323268172@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org James Morris wrote: > > However, we don't have to include the DSA stuff in the kernel; I can always > > discard that patch from the upstream-aimed patchset. > > I'd encourage dropping DSA, as there appears to be no legacy justification > for its inclusion. Okay, done that. David