* md wierdness with 2.6.0test9
@ 2003-11-01 2:35 Brad Langhorst
2003-11-01 13:41 ` Dick Streefland
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Brad Langhorst @ 2003-11-01 2:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I have a pretty simple little raid 1
/dev/hda1 and /dev/hdc1 should be mirrors of each other.
i created the raid like this
mdadm --create --level 1 -n 2 /dev/md0 /dev/hdc1 missing
(this is from memory - just to give you an idea of how this happened)
i also created /dev/md1 for swap
mdadm --create --level 1 -n 2 /dev/md1 /dev/hdc2 /dev/hda2
now when i go to add /dev/hda1 to the array all looks fine
mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/hda1
mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/hda1
array syncs up but i see this wierdness (it exists across reboots)
from mdadm --details /dev/md0
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 22 1 0 active sync /dev/hdc1
1 0 0 -1 removed
2 3 1 1 spare /dev/hda1
rebooting to a 2.4 series kernel appears to fix this problem...
In my search for information I read this post
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&threadm=rvg0.5x4.17%40gated-at.bofh.it&rnum=4&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dmdadm%2Bfaulty%2Bremoved%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3Dutf-8%26selm%3Drvg0.5x4.17%2540gated-at.bofh.it%26rnum%3D4
which talks about patching md.c to fix a similar problem...
In test9 the patch discussed is already applied
so it either doesn't fix the problem or this problem is not the same
problem
best wishes
brad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: md wierdness with 2.6.0test9
2003-11-01 2:35 md wierdness with 2.6.0test9 Brad Langhorst
@ 2003-11-01 13:41 ` Dick Streefland
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dick Streefland @ 2003-11-01 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Brad Langhorst <brad@langhorst.com> wrote:
| array syncs up but i see this wierdness (it exists across reboots)
| from mdadm --details /dev/md0
|
| Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
| 0 22 1 0 active sync /dev/hdc1
| 1 0 0 -1 removed
| 2 3 1 1 spare /dev/hda1
|
| rebooting to a 2.4 series kernel appears to fix this problem...
Mmm, this looks familiar to me. See my email to linux-raid:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg03610.html
The patch in one of the replies fixed the problem for me.
However, this patch hasn't been included in Linus' kernel yet.
--
Dick Streefland //// De Bilt
dick.streefland@xs4all.nl (@ @) The Netherlands
------------------------------oOO--(_)--OOo------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-11-01 13:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-11-01 2:35 md wierdness with 2.6.0test9 Brad Langhorst
2003-11-01 13:41 ` Dick Streefland
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox