From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, patches@lists.linux.dev,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Move alternative length validation into subsection
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 23:55:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2827138.e9J7NaK4W3@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220516214520.3252074-1-nathan@kernel.org>
Hi,
Am Montag, 16. Mai 2022, 23:45:21 CEST schrieb Nathan Chancellor:
> After commit 49b290e430d3 ("riscv: prevent compressed instructions in
> alternatives"), builds with LLVM's integrated assembler fail:
the commit in question didn't change anything there, so I guess
the issue itself was present before that already and the
commit only triggered the different buildbots?
> In file included from arch/riscv/mm/init.c:10:
> In file included from ./include/linux/mm.h:29:
> In file included from ./include/linux/pgtable.h:6:
> In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h:108:
> ./arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h:23:2: error: expected assembly-time absolute expression
> ALT_FLUSH_TLB_PAGE(__asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma %0" : : "r" (addr) : "memory"));
> ^
> ./arch/riscv/include/asm/errata_list.h:33:5: note: expanded from macro 'ALT_FLUSH_TLB_PAGE'
> asm(ALTERNATIVE("sfence.vma %0", "sfence.vma", SIFIVE_VENDOR_ID, \
> ^
> ./arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative-macros.h:187:2: note: expanded from macro 'ALTERNATIVE'
> _ALTERNATIVE_CFG(old_content, new_content, vendor_id, errata_id, CONFIG_k)
> ^
> ./arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative-macros.h:113:2: note: expanded from macro '_ALTERNATIVE_CFG'
> __ALTERNATIVE_CFG(old_c, new_c, vendor_id, errata_id, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_k))
> ^
> ./arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative-macros.h:110:2: note: expanded from macro '__ALTERNATIVE_CFG'
> ALT_NEW_CONTENT(vendor_id, errata_id, enable, new_c)
> ^
> ./arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative-macros.h:99:3: note: expanded from macro 'ALT_NEW_CONTENT'
> ".org . - (889b - 888b) + (887b - 886b)\n" \
> ^
> <inline asm>:26:6: note: instantiated into assembly here
> .org . - (889b - 888b) + (887b - 886b)
> ^
>
> This error happens because LLVM's integrated assembler has a one-pass
> design, which means it cannot figure out the instruction lengths when
> the .org directive is outside of the subsection that contains the
> instructions, which was changed by the .option directives added by the
> above change.
>
> Move the .org directives before the .previous directive so that these
> directives are always within the same subsection, which resolves the
> failures and does not introduce any new issues with GNU as. This was
> done for arm64 in commit 966a0acce2fc ("arm64/alternatives: move length
> validation inside the subsection") and commit 22315a2296f4 ("arm64:
> alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif}").
>
> While there is no error from the assembly versions of the macro, they
> appear to have the same problem so just make the same change there as
> well so that there are no problems in the future.
>
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1640
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
In any case, on my svpbmt testcases (qemu + d1-nezha):
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Thanks for looking into that
Heiko
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative-macros.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative-macros.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative-macros.h
> index e13b1f6bb400..ec2f3f1b836f 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative-macros.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative-macros.h
> @@ -27,9 +27,9 @@
> \new_c
> .option pop
> 889 :
> - .previous
> .org . - (889b - 888b) + (887b - 886b)
> .org . - (887b - 886b) + (889b - 888b)
> + .previous
> .endif
> .endm
>
> @@ -94,9 +94,9 @@
> new_c "\n" \
> ".option pop\n" \
> "889 :\n" \
> - ".previous\n" \
> ".org . - (887b - 886b) + (889b - 888b)\n" \
> ".org . - (889b - 888b) + (887b - 886b)\n" \
> + ".previous\n" \
> ".endif\n"
>
> #define __ALTERNATIVE_CFG(old_c, new_c, vendor_id, errata_id, enable) \
>
> base-commit: 93c0651617a62a69717299f1464dda798af8bebb
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-16 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-16 21:45 [PATCH] riscv: Move alternative length validation into subsection Nathan Chancellor
2022-05-16 21:55 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2022-05-16 22:38 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-06-03 1:34 ` Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2827138.e9J7NaK4W3@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox