From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: angquan yu <angquan21@gmail.com>
Cc: shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests:proc: Resolve 'Unused Result' Warning from proc-empty-vm.c
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:25:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2845b899-efd8-49db-8ea6-18834e97071e@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231129034556.5719-1-angquan21@gmail.com>
On 11/28/23 20:45, angquan yu wrote:
> From: angquan yu <angquan21@gmail.com>
>
> In tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-empty->because the return value
> of a write call was being ignored. This call was partof a conditional
> debugging block (if (0) { ... }), which meant it would neveractually
> execute.
>
> This patch removes the unused debug write call. This cleanup resolves
> the compi>warning about ignoring the result of write declared with
> the warn_unused_resultattribute.
>
> Removing this code also improves the clarity and maintainability of
> the function, as it eliminates a non-functional block of code.
>
> This is original warning: proc-empty-vm.c: In function
> ‘test_proc_pid_statm’ :proc-empty-vm.c:385:17:
> warning: ignoring return value of ‘write’
> declared with>385 | write(1, buf, rv);|
>
> Signed-off-by: angquan yu <angquan21@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-empty-vm.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-empty-vm.c b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-empty-vm.c
> index 5e7020630..d231e61e4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-empty-vm.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-empty-vm.c
> @@ -383,8 +383,10 @@ static int test_proc_pid_statm(pid_t pid)
> assert(rv <= sizeof(buf));
> if (0) {
> ssize_t written = write(1, buf, rv);
> +
> if (written == -1) {
> perror("write failed to /proc/${pid}");
> + return EXIT_FAILURE;
> }
> }
>
Hmm. Is this patch based on Linux 6.7-rc3? The code doesn't
match?
thanks,
-- Shuah
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-30 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-29 3:45 [PATCH] selftests:proc: Resolve 'Unused Result' Warning from proc-empty-vm.c angquan yu
2023-11-30 20:25 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2845b899-efd8-49db-8ea6-18834e97071e@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=angquan21@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox