From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>,
b-liu@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 14:29:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2858481.CenWEf7Gbi@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bmtd1hi3.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Hi Felipe,
On Tuesday 07 Mar 2017 12:57:40 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Laurent Pinchart writes:
> > On Friday 03 Mar 2017 13:17:15 Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> On alternate setting change, webcam gadget sends us a UVC_EVENT_STREAMON
> >> or UVC_EVENT_STREAMOFF event. It expects delayed status response on
> >> STREAMON event only but doesn't expect us to send that response over USB.
> >> It sends the delayed response when we issue the VIDIOC_STREAMON ioctl.
> >>
> >> So we must not send UVCIOC_SEND_RESPONSE ioctl in these cases that too
> >> with invalid response length.
> >
> > The commit message only explains why we should not call
> > UVCIOC_SEND_RESPONSE in response to a STREAMON event, but not why we
> > shouldn't either in response to a STREAMOFF event. The patch is correct
> > changing both, but I propose wording the above two paragraphs as follows.
> >
> > "uvc-gadget: Do not send Set Interface (alternate setting) response twice
> >
> > On alternate setting change, the webcam gadget sends us a
> > UVC_EVENT_STREAMON or UVC_EVENT_STREAMOFF event. In the first case, the
> > driver will issue a delayed status response automatically when we call
> > the VIDIOC_STREAMON ioctl. In the second case, the driver sends the
> > status response immediately. We must thus not send the status response
> > manually with UVCIOC_SEND_RESPONSE in any of those cases."
> >
> > If you're fine with that I'll change the message when applying, there's no
> > need to resend the patch.
>
> I have this in my testing/fixes and was planning to send it to Greg this
> week. I can drop it from my queue, no problem, but then let me know as
> you would need my acked-by.
This is a userspace application patch. Feel free to send it to Greg, but I
don't think he will know what to do with it :-) Were you maybe confusing this
patch with the kernel fix that Roger sent a few days ago ? That one should be
queued, please keep it in your tree.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-07 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-03 11:17 [PATCH] uvc-gadget: Fix Set Interface (alternate setting) response behaviour Roger Quadros
2017-03-06 14:29 ` Felipe Balbi
2017-03-06 14:39 ` Bin Liu
2017-03-06 20:50 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-03-07 8:41 ` Roger Quadros
2017-03-07 10:57 ` Felipe Balbi
2017-03-07 12:29 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2017-03-07 12:56 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2858481.CenWEf7Gbi@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=b-liu@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).