public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@lists.linux.dev, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
	Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] of: Add test managed wrappers for of_overlay_apply()/of_node_put()
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 15:39:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2863a45a9fa0479707672c52164ceb0d.sboyd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABVgOS=duqR0Lea0i92pWR-618iRGkvvATk30MJrU7RRDR8LPg@mail.gmail.com>

Quoting David Gow (2024-06-13 00:48:54)
> 
> This looks good to me.
> 
> I was a little confused at first by some of the wrapper names: in
> particular that of_overlay_fdt_apply_kunit() is applying the overlay
> immediately, and deferring a cleanup action, but of_node_put_kunit()
> is not doing anything immediately, and deferring the put action. My
> feeling is that the ideal thing would be to have wrappers for all of
> the of_* functions which return a node which needs to be 'put', and
> have those wrappers add an of_node_put() action. You could then have
> of_node_put_kunit() provide a way to trigger that action early. But
> that seems like it'd be a lot of work and generate a lot of wrappers
> we otherwise wouldn't need, so this seems an okay compromise to be
> able to keep using the existing of_ functions. The documentation /
> comments help make this more clear, too.
> 
> So, no actual problems. (Assuming you don't want to put the
> documentation under the devicetree rather than under KUnit -- it can
> go either way.)
> 
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> 

Thanks. I'll just leave this alone as I feel like the kunit postfix
means "do stuff when test is done".

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-02 22:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-03 22:37 [PATCH v5 00/11] clk: Add kunit tests for fixed rate and parent data Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] of/platform: Allow overlays to create platform devices from the root node Stephen Boyd
2024-06-05 23:47   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-03 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] of: Add test managed wrappers for of_overlay_apply()/of_node_put() Stephen Boyd
2024-06-13  7:48   ` David Gow
2024-07-02 22:39     ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add "test" vendor for KUnit and friends Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] dt-bindings: test: Add KUnit empty node binding Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] of: Add a KUnit test for overlays and test managed APIs Stephen Boyd
2024-06-05 23:47   ` Rob Herring
2024-06-06 15:23     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-13  7:50   ` David Gow
2024-07-02 21:45     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] platform: Add test managed platform_device/driver APIs Stephen Boyd
2024-06-04 13:48   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-06-13  7:50   ` David Gow
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] dt-bindings: test: Add single clk consumer Stephen Boyd
2024-06-04 12:50   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-04 13:05   ` Rob Herring
2024-06-04 18:28     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-04 20:19       ` Rob Herring
2024-06-04 20:52         ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-04 20:53         ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] clk: Add test managed clk provider/consumer APIs Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] clk: Add KUnit tests for clk fixed rate basic type Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] dt-bindings: clk: Add clk_parent_data test Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] clk: Add KUnit tests for clks registered with struct clk_parent_data Stephen Boyd
2024-06-13  7:56   ` David Gow
2024-07-02 22:25     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-07-02 22:34       ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2863a45a9fa0479707672c52164ceb0d.sboyd@kernel.org \
    --to=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox