From: Raphael Manfredi <Raphael_Manfredi@pobox.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: setsockopt(SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF) broken on 2.4.18?
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 22:08:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2871.1014671286@nice.ram.loc> (raw)
Hi,
I run:
Linux nice 2.4.18-pre7 #1 SMP Mon Jan 28 23:12:48 MET 2002 i686 unknown
I noticed that whenever I do:
setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF....)
followed by
getsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF....)
to verify what the kernel has set, I read TWICE as much the amount used
for the set. That is, if I set 8192, I read 16384. Therefore, to set
the correct size, I need to half the parameter first.
Is this a known bug? Is it setsockopt or getsockopt which returns the
wrong size?
Here's sample code demonstrating the problem:
--------------------------
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
static void set_send_buf(int fd, int size)
{
int new_len;
int arglen = sizeof(new_len);
if (-1 == setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF, &size, sizeof(size)))
perror("setsockopt");
if (-1 == getsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF, &new_len, &arglen))
perror("getsockopt");
printf("size was %d, but set %d\n", size, new_len);
}
main()
{
int fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
set_send_buf(fd, 8192);
set_send_buf(fd, 16384);
}
--------------------------
When run, it displays:
size was 8192, but set 16384
size was 16384, but set 32768
Raphael
next reply other threads:[~2002-02-25 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-25 21:08 Raphael Manfredi [this message]
2002-02-25 21:34 ` setsockopt(SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF) broken on 2.4.18? Richard B. Johnson
2002-02-25 22:19 ` Raphael Manfredi
2002-02-25 23:21 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-25 22:39 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-26 7:46 ` Raphael Manfredi
2002-02-26 9:39 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-26 12:54 ` Raphael Manfredi
2002-02-27 16:17 ` Horst von Brand
[not found] <E16_Tly-0006Va-00@the-village.bc.nu>
2002-02-26 0:11 ` Ton Hospel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2871.1014671286@nice.ram.loc \
--to=raphael_manfredi@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox