Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 9

Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-09T16:08:59Z

On Tuesday 09 February 2016 16:01:18 Mark Rutland wrote:
> That builds fine for me atop of for-next/pgtable, both 64-bit and
> 32-bit.
>
> GCC seems to treat enum fixed_addresses the same as unsigned. Only if I
> change the type of idx in fixmap.h (e.g. to char) do I get a conflict
> against paravirt.h

Interesting.

The patch seems fine then:

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>