From: "Bodo Eggert" <7eggert@nurfuerspam.de>
To: root@chaos.analogic.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fw: signed kernel modules?
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:19:46 +0200 (MEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28998.1098526786@www44.gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.61.0410180724110.18025@chaos.analogic.com
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2004, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> > Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> >> One can make a 'certified' kernel with 'certified' modules
> >> for some hush-hush project. Adding this kind of junk isn't
> >> how it's done. You just take your favorite kernel with the
> >> modules you require, you verify that it meets your security
> >> requirements, then you CRC the kernel and its modules. You
> >> keep the CRCs somewhere safe, available from a read-only
> >> source like a CD/ROM or a network file-server.
[...]
> > If a malicious module loads, you lose instantly. You cannot relaibly
> check
> > module integrity on this system anymore. E.g. the malicious module might
> > patch the module checker to check a signed module instead of the
> malicious
> > one. Or the Exploit saves the old module, puts in the patched one, loads
> it
> > and puts the old one back in place.
> What malicious module? They have all been certified. That ARE NO
> OTHER modules.
At least until an attacker uploads a malicious module or modifies one of the
(untill then) certified modules. (He can, because your kernel doesn't check
them while loading.)
> If you don't do it this way, i.e., if you allow
> anybody to load a module, then you have no security, regardless of
> what's in the module, the loader, or the kernel. Any crap inside
> either of these is crap. Then can all be modified to do anything
> so gigibytes of "protective" software is absouye bullshit, and
> a lot of memory wasted.
If your box is r00ted, you'll want to notice this fact and do something
against it. If you don't prevent loading malicious modules, the attacker can
hide his presence and use your system right under your eyes, and you won't
notice (even while checking the checksumes).
Signing modules is (off cause) just one step, the next one(s) would be to
prevent all other modifications to the kernel memory.
--
Geschenkt: 3 Monate GMX ProMail + 3 Ausgaben der TV Movie mit DVD
++++ Jetzt anmelden und testen http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail ++++
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-23 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.ghoqtmo.8nqeb0@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.jtpibm5.1l4ki17@ifi.uio.no>
2004-10-17 15:13 ` Fw: signed kernel modules? Bodo Eggert
2004-10-18 11:27 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-10-23 10:19 ` Bodo Eggert [this message]
2004-10-15 15:37 Chuck Ebbert
2004-10-15 16:05 ` Olivier Galibert
[not found] <1096411448.3230.22.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <1092403984.29463.11.camel@bach>
[not found] ` <1092369784.25194.225.camel@bach>
[not found] ` <20040812092029.GA30255@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20040811211719.GD21894@kroah.com>
[not found] ` <OF4B7132F5.8BE9D947-ON87256EEB.007192D0-86256EEB.00740B23@us.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <1092097278.20335.51.camel@bach>
[not found] ` <20040810002741.GA7764@kroah.com>
[not found] ` <1092189167.22236.67.camel@bach>
[not found] ` <19388.1092301990@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <30797.1092308768@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20040812111853.GB25950@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20040812200917.GD2952@kroah.com>
[not found] ` <26280.1092388799@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <27175.1095936746@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <30591.1096451074@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <1096544201.8043.816.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2004-10-11 15:11 ` David Howells
2004-10-11 15:15 ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-11 22:34 ` Rusty Russell (IBM)
2004-10-12 8:35 ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-12 19:08 ` Greg KH
2004-10-12 19:16 ` David Howells
2004-10-12 20:43 ` David Howells
2004-10-13 0:20 ` Rusty Russell (IBM)
2004-10-13 8:24 ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-13 0:11 ` Rusty Russell (IBM)
2004-10-13 9:16 ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-13 21:21 ` Rusty Russell (IBM)
2004-10-13 9:24 ` David Howells
2004-10-13 10:42 ` Alan Cox
2004-10-13 22:40 ` Rusty Russell (IBM)
2004-10-14 10:17 ` David Howells
2004-10-15 0:28 ` Rusty Russell (IBM)
2004-10-14 23:44 ` Alan Cox
2004-10-15 1:00 ` Rusty Russell (IBM)
2004-10-13 21:18 ` David Howells
2004-10-13 21:51 ` Roman Zippel
2004-10-14 11:12 ` David Howells
2004-10-14 12:01 ` Roman Zippel
2004-10-14 12:11 ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-14 14:22 ` Roman Zippel
2004-10-14 14:30 ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-14 21:03 ` Roman Zippel
2004-10-14 21:24 ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-14 21:36 ` Roman Zippel
2004-10-14 21:52 ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-14 22:15 ` Roman Zippel
2004-10-14 22:32 ` David Howells
2004-10-14 22:38 ` Roman Zippel
2004-10-14 12:14 ` David Howells
2004-10-14 13:08 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-10-14 14:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-10-14 14:25 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-10-14 15:40 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-10-14 15:50 ` Dave Jones
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410141352590.8479@chaos.analogic.com>
2004-10-14 18:20 ` Dave Jones
2004-10-14 18:30 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-10-14 18:46 ` Dave Jones
2004-10-14 19:03 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-10-14 19:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-10-14 21:13 ` Dave Jones
2004-10-18 1:56 ` Jon Masters
2004-10-13 23:01 ` Rusty Russell
2004-10-14 11:02 ` David Howells
2004-10-15 0:47 ` Rusty Russell
2004-10-14 18:09 ` David Howells
2004-10-15 11:12 ` Roman Zippel
2004-10-15 12:10 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-10-15 12:31 ` Josh Boyer
2004-10-15 15:53 ` Gene Heskett
2004-10-15 16:17 ` Josh Boyer
2004-10-15 16:59 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-10-15 17:08 ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-15 17:35 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-10-15 20:56 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-15 21:18 ` Greg KH
2004-10-15 21:34 ` Chris Friesen
2004-10-15 22:08 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-10-18 12:53 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-10-18 13:53 ` Matthew Garrett
2004-10-18 14:09 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-10-18 16:33 ` Greg KH
2004-10-18 17:14 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-10-18 17:28 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-10-15 17:46 ` Josh Boyer
2004-10-15 20:11 ` Tonnerre
2004-10-17 20:18 ` Thomas Weber
2004-10-17 20:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-10-17 21:25 ` Thomas Weber
2004-10-15 12:48 ` Roman Zippel
2004-10-15 15:51 ` Gene Heskett
2004-10-15 14:01 ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-15 14:28 ` Roman Zippel
2004-10-15 15:54 ` Gene Heskett
2004-10-15 16:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-10-14 18:44 ` Thomas Weber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28998.1098526786@www44.gmx.net \
--to=7eggert@nurfuerspam.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox