Re: [RFC PATCH 07/16] PCI: Separate pci_host_bridge creation out of pci_create_root_bus()

Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-18T12:26:40Z

On Tuesday 18 November 2014 19:44:36 Yijing Wang wrote:
> On 2014/11/18 17:30, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 November 2014 16:32:26 Yijing Wang wrote:
> >
> >>>> +static struct resource busn_resource = {
> >>>> + .name = "PCI busn",
> >>>> + .start = 0,
> >>>> + .end = 255,
> >>>> + .flags = IORESOURCE_BUS,
> >>>> +};
> >>>
> >>> I think it would be better to require callers to pass the bus resource
> >>> down to the function.
> >>
> >> Hmm, I think most of caller will provide the bus resource, but some others
> >> will not give any bus resource, extremely, no any resources :(. But we still
> >> need properly configure their resources for compatibility.
> >
> > I think that is what the conversion to pci_scan_bus_parented() is about:
> > The idea is that we add the correct bus resource to callers of
> > pci_scan_bus_parented or pci_scan_bus and then change them to call
> > pci_scan_root_bus instead.
>
> It looks good to me, but for simplification, or I will try to use a wrapper to
> process the drivers don't pass the busnr resources, and make sure the generic
> pci_create_host_bridge() always get the valid resources.

Ok.

> >>>> +struct pci_host_bridge *pci_create_host_bridge(
> >>>> + struct device *parent, u32 db,
> >>>> + struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata,
> >>>> + struct list_head *resources)
> >>>> +{
> >>>
> >>> Do we still need to pass the 'sysdata' in here? If we are guaranteed to
> >>> have a device pointer, we should always be able to get the driver
> >>> private data from dev_get_drvdata(host->dev->parent).
> >>
> >> We need, some platforms pass NULL pointer as host bridge parent.
> >
> > But those don't have to use the new pci_create_host_bridge() function,
> > right?
>
> As I mentioned in another reply, I hope all pci host drivers could use
> pci_create_host_bridge(), keep different PCI scan interfaces in PCI core
> make things become complex.

Doing this for all platforms that have PCI support would be a lot of
work though, I think it's better to focus on having a the best interface
for the majority of users.

Arnd