From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+3c0a98026cec79f550a2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING in fpregs_assert_state_consistent
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 11:21:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2939ec67-4d27-13bb-e1a5-24fba0ba86c0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000000000000b97df105d77d8a9b@google.com>
On 2/8/22 00:31, syzbot wrote:
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare arch/x86/include/asm/entry-common.h:56 [inline]
> exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x57/0x290 kernel/entry/common.c:209
> __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:289 [inline]
> syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x60 kernel/entry/common.c:300
> do_syscall_64+0x42/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Just in case it saves anyone else the trouble...
This is a WARN_ON_FPU() that triggers inside
fpregs_assert_state_consistent() because TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD is clear
while !fpregs_state_valid().
In other words, the FPU registers are *in*valid, but they're also not
marked to be reloaded. They must be valid before returning to userspace.
The stack trace is not very helpful because it's almost empty on the
return to userspace.
I don't see anything x86-FPU-specific between 5.17-rc2 and the
linux-next commit in question.
I think we need to wait on a reproducer or a more revealing warning.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-08 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-08 8:31 [syzbot] WARNING in fpregs_assert_state_consistent syzbot
2022-02-08 19:21 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2939ec67-4d27-13bb-e1a5-24fba0ba86c0@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+3c0a98026cec79f550a2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox