From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Mark Moseley <moseleymark@gmail.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com,
Linux filesystem caching discussion list
<linux-cachefs@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-cachefs] 3.0.3 64-bit Crash running fscache/cachefilesd
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:46:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29424.1319100412@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOH1cH=smX1tWLB6PwaRfcrOu5YErF3TGUDoRnLZGmxvGH9rAA@mail.gmail.com>
Mark Moseley <moseleymark@gmail.com> wrote:
> I left the existing cache in place. For a few hours, it was culling
That will be whilst the inode cache was filling, I suspect.
> Is there anything I can do to verify whether the objects are indeed
> pinned? This is a pretty busy box. The nfs inode cache is quite large
> (from slabtop):
Hmmm... Can you get me a dump of /proc/fs/fscache/stats to look at?
The "Objects:" and "Relinqs:" lines are the most interesting. On the first
line avl=N shows the number of objects that are in the "available" state -
ie. are live for caching.
Also, can you do:
df -i /path/to/cache/partition
to get the number of inodes available and used.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-20 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-25 16:44 3.0.3 64-bit Crash running fscache/cachefilesd Mark Moseley
2011-08-26 12:52 ` [Linux-cachefs] " Дмитрий Ильин
2011-09-01 13:04 ` David Howells
2011-09-22 17:03 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-22 21:41 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-26 11:32 ` David Howells
2011-09-26 21:02 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-27 0:59 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-27 23:46 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-29 14:57 ` David Howells
2011-09-29 15:51 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-29 16:30 ` David Howells
2011-09-29 19:02 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-29 22:11 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-29 22:44 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-29 22:44 ` David Howells
2011-09-29 22:51 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-30 12:28 ` David Howells
2011-09-30 18:57 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-30 20:10 ` David Howells
2011-10-05 13:37 ` David Howells
2011-10-05 13:49 ` David Howells
2011-10-07 10:42 ` David Howells
2011-10-08 16:32 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-11 13:07 ` David Howells
2011-10-11 16:27 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-12 9:26 ` David Howells
2011-10-12 10:05 ` David Howells
2011-10-12 18:10 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-12 23:38 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-13 15:21 ` David Howells
2011-10-13 20:48 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-14 9:22 ` David Howells
2011-10-14 23:25 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-17 10:39 ` David Howells
2011-10-19 12:25 ` David Howells
2011-10-19 23:15 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-20 8:46 ` David Howells [this message]
2011-10-20 19:37 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-20 9:03 ` David Howells
2011-10-20 19:29 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-20 23:05 ` David Howells
2011-10-21 0:21 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-21 8:16 ` David Howells
2011-10-21 18:09 ` Mark Moseley
2011-12-13 1:56 ` Mark Moseley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29424.1319100412@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=moseleymark@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).