public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@gmail.com>
To: "John M. King" <jmking1@uiuc.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible race in sound/oss/forte.c ?
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:31:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <29495f1d05081114312e3dc2fa@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42FB8522.7080605@uiuc.edu>

On 8/11/05, John M. King <jmking1@uiuc.edu> wrote:
> I know the OSS drivers are deprecated, but I'm trying to figure this out
> for my own understanding.
> 
> Here's code from sound/oss/forte.c, in the write system call handler.  A
> test has already been performed (under the protection of the lock) and
> the driver has decided to sleep.
> 
>     add_wait_queue (&channel->wait, &wait);
> 
>     for (;;) {
>         spin_unlock_irqrestore (&chip->lock, flags);
> 
>         set_current_state (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>         schedule();
> 
>         spin_lock_irqsave (&chip->lock, flags);
> 
>         if (channel->frag_num - channel->filled_frags)
>             break;
>     }
> 
>     remove_wait_queue (&channel->wait, &wait);
>     set_current_state (TASK_RUNNING);
> 
> The driver's interrupt handler calls wake_up_all().  What if an
> interrupt occurs just after the spin_unlock_irqrestore() but before
> setting TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (and the interrupt handler does stuff that
> causes the tested conditional to be true as well)?  The interrupt calls
> wake_up_all(), but then when control returns here, the process will mark
> itself TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE right away and sleep, effectively missing the
> wake_up_all().
> 
> Is this a race condition?  If not, can someone point out the error(s) in
> my reasoning?  Please CC me as I'm not subscribed to the list.

This is broken code. You are supposed to set the state before adding
oneself to the wait-queue, if you are going to unconditionally sleep,
I believe.

So, the loop probably should be:

prepare_to_wait(&channel->wait, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);

for (;;) {
         spin_unlock_irqrestore (&chip->lock, flags);
 
         set_current_state (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); // redundant in the
first iteration
         schedule();
 
         spin_lock_irqsave (&chip->lock, flags);
 
         if (channel->frag_num - channel->filled_frags)
             break;
}
 
finish_wait(&channel->wait, &wait);

Thanks,
Nish

      reply	other threads:[~2005-08-11 21:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-11 17:04 Possible race in sound/oss/forte.c ? John M. King
2005-08-11 21:31 ` Nish Aravamudan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=29495f1d05081114312e3dc2fa@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=nish.aravamudan@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmking1@uiuc.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox