public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@knobisoft.de>
To: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hmh@hmh.eng.br
Subject: Re: 2.6.25.2 - Jiffies/Time jumping back and forth (Regereesion from 2.6.24)
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 07:05:05 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <295530.5900.qm@web32602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)

----- Original Message ----

> From: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com>
> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@knobisoft.de>; Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; hmh@hmh.eng.br
> Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2008 2:21:57 PM
> Subject: Re: 2.6.25.2 - Jiffies/Time jumping back and forth (Regereesion from 2.6.24)
> 
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 May 2008, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> >>> no this looks different. As soon as the timesource is detected, I see 
> non-zero 
> >>> timestamps
> >>> in dmesg, but they look smaller and jump in both directions. And I have 
> never 
> >>> seen this before
> >>> 2.6.25.
> >>>
> >>> It actually might be a good idea to get the dmesg output from 2.6.24.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Martin
> >>  interesting - maybe related to clocksources. The HPET seems to be detected 
> later in 2.6.25:
> >>
> >> 2.6.24:
> >>
> >> [    0.000000] Initializing CPU#0
> >> [    0.000000] PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 32768 bytes)
> >> -->[    0.000000] hpet clockevent registered
> >> -->[    0.000000] TSC calibrated against HPET
> >  
> >> 2.6.25.2:
> >>
> >> [    0.000000] Initializing CPU#0
> >> [    0.000000] PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 32768 bytes)
> >> -->[    0.000000] TSC calibrated against PM_TIMER
> >  
> > That's odd indeed. Is HPET not registered at all in 2.6.25 or does it just 
> happen late ?
> > 
> > please provide the output of:
> > /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource
> > /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
> 
> I was about to report / ask bout this issue too.
> 
> I see the same output for >=2.6.25 , TSC calibrated against PM_TIMER and not 
> against HPET anymore.
> 
> 
> [    0.000000] TSC calibrated against PM_TIMER
> [    0.000016] time.c: Detected 2499.949 MHz processor.
> ...
> [    0.000999] hpet clockevent registered
> 
> So it seems to register to late in >=2.6.25 kernels ?
> 
> cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource
> tsc hpet acpi_pm jiffies
> 
> cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
> tsc
> 
> 
on two different systems running 2.6.25.2:

ibm x3650(2xDualCore)
-------------------------------------
[root@lpsdm60 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource
tsc hpet acpi_pm jiffies
[root@lpsdm60 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
tsc

HP Proliant DL-380G4 (2xSingleCore)
------------------------------------------------------------
[root@lpsdm52 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource
tsc hpet acpi_pm jiffies
[root@lpsdm52 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
tsc

and on the DL380G4 running 2.6.24:
---------------------------------------------------------
[root@lpsdm52 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource
hpet acpi_pm jiffies tsc
[root@lpsdm52 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
hpet


Cheers
Martin

             reply	other threads:[~2008-05-08 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-08 14:05 Martin Knoblauch [this message]
2008-05-08 14:13 ` 2.6.25.2 - Jiffies/Time jumping back and forth (Regereesion from 2.6.24) Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-08 17:31   ` Mike Galbraith
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-09 15:18 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-09 13:01 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-09 11:32 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-09 11:06 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-08 16:41 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-07 18:14 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-07 18:59 ` John Stultz
2008-05-07 15:50 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-08 10:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-08 12:21   ` Gabriel C
2008-05-07 15:02 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-07 12:42 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-07 12:56 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-05-07 13:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2008-05-07 17:07 ` john stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=295530.5900.qm@web32602.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
    --to=spamtrap@knobisoft.de \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@gmail.com \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nix.or.die@googlemail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox