From: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@knobisoft.de>
To: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hmh@hmh.eng.br
Subject: Re: 2.6.25.2 - Jiffies/Time jumping back and forth (Regereesion from 2.6.24)
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 07:05:05 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <295530.5900.qm@web32602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
----- Original Message ----
> From: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com>
> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@knobisoft.de>; Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; hmh@hmh.eng.br
> Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2008 2:21:57 PM
> Subject: Re: 2.6.25.2 - Jiffies/Time jumping back and forth (Regereesion from 2.6.24)
>
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 May 2008, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> >>> no this looks different. As soon as the timesource is detected, I see
> non-zero
> >>> timestamps
> >>> in dmesg, but they look smaller and jump in both directions. And I have
> never
> >>> seen this before
> >>> 2.6.25.
> >>>
> >>> It actually might be a good idea to get the dmesg output from 2.6.24.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Martin
> >> interesting - maybe related to clocksources. The HPET seems to be detected
> later in 2.6.25:
> >>
> >> 2.6.24:
> >>
> >> [ 0.000000] Initializing CPU#0
> >> [ 0.000000] PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 32768 bytes)
> >> -->[ 0.000000] hpet clockevent registered
> >> -->[ 0.000000] TSC calibrated against HPET
> >
> >> 2.6.25.2:
> >>
> >> [ 0.000000] Initializing CPU#0
> >> [ 0.000000] PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 32768 bytes)
> >> -->[ 0.000000] TSC calibrated against PM_TIMER
> >
> > That's odd indeed. Is HPET not registered at all in 2.6.25 or does it just
> happen late ?
> >
> > please provide the output of:
> > /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource
> > /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
>
> I was about to report / ask bout this issue too.
>
> I see the same output for >=2.6.25 , TSC calibrated against PM_TIMER and not
> against HPET anymore.
>
>
> [ 0.000000] TSC calibrated against PM_TIMER
> [ 0.000016] time.c: Detected 2499.949 MHz processor.
> ...
> [ 0.000999] hpet clockevent registered
>
> So it seems to register to late in >=2.6.25 kernels ?
>
> cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource
> tsc hpet acpi_pm jiffies
>
> cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
> tsc
>
>
on two different systems running 2.6.25.2:
ibm x3650(2xDualCore)
-------------------------------------
[root@lpsdm60 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource
tsc hpet acpi_pm jiffies
[root@lpsdm60 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
tsc
HP Proliant DL-380G4 (2xSingleCore)
------------------------------------------------------------
[root@lpsdm52 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource
tsc hpet acpi_pm jiffies
[root@lpsdm52 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
tsc
and on the DL380G4 running 2.6.24:
---------------------------------------------------------
[root@lpsdm52 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource
hpet acpi_pm jiffies tsc
[root@lpsdm52 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
hpet
Cheers
Martin
next reply other threads:[~2008-05-08 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-08 14:05 Martin Knoblauch [this message]
2008-05-08 14:13 ` 2.6.25.2 - Jiffies/Time jumping back and forth (Regereesion from 2.6.24) Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-08 17:31 ` Mike Galbraith
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-09 15:18 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-09 13:01 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-09 11:32 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-09 11:06 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-08 16:41 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-07 18:14 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-07 18:59 ` John Stultz
2008-05-07 15:50 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-08 10:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-08 12:21 ` Gabriel C
2008-05-07 15:02 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-07 12:42 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-07 12:56 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-05-07 13:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2008-05-07 17:07 ` john stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=295530.5900.qm@web32602.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
--to=spamtrap@knobisoft.de \
--cc=bart.vanassche@gmail.com \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nix.or.die@googlemail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox